linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gilberto Diaz <gilberto@ula.ve>
To: Gordon Henderson <gordon@drogon.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpu consumption
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:13:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D619DE.7010900@ula.ve> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0601232238440.23760@lion.drogon.net>

Thanks Gordon, Guy, Michel and Neil, your advises were very useful.

    Gordon was right, all raids are still syncing (Bellow part of the
/proc/mdstat file).  Guy you were right too, the command "uptime" does
not display the cpu load directly, sorry about that.


Best regards
Gilberto

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] [multipath] [raid6]
[raid10] [faulty]
 
md6 : active raid1 sdk[0] sdl[1]
      244190144 blocks [2/2] [UU]
      [================>....]  resync = 83.4% (203849152/244190144)
finish=5.0min spee
d=131933K/sec
     
md5 : active raid1 sdi[0] sdj[1]
      244190144 blocks [2/2] [UU]
      [================>....]  resync = 83.8% (204684480/244190144)
finish=5.1min spee
d=127124K/sec
     
.
.
.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Gordon Henderson wrote:

>On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Gilberto Diaz wrote:
>
>  
>
>>   The problem is that the following proccesses are using a lot of cpu
>>time.
>>
>>    md1_raid1
>>    md1_resync
>>    ......
>>    md6_raid1
>>    md6_resync
>>
>>    Here is a sample of the uptime command
>>
>>17:54:16 up  5:48,  2 users,  load average: 5.02, 5.05, 5.26
>>
>>    Does anybody have an idea what is the problem? Thank a lot in advance
>>    
>>
>
>to me, it looks like the "problem" is that the RAID system is still
>creating the array and syncing all the partitions up. Once it's finished
>your system will be idle.
>
>I bet it's stopped doing it by the time you get this email... What does
>the output of
>
>  cat /proc/mdstat
>
>look like?
>
>Gordon
>
>  
>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-24 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-23 22:28 cpu consumption Gilberto Diaz
2006-01-23 22:40 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-24 12:13   ` Gilberto Diaz [this message]
2006-01-23 23:08 ` Guy
2006-01-24  3:05 ` Neil Brown
2006-01-24  6:03   ` Mitchell Laks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43D619DE.7010900@ula.ve \
    --to=gilberto@ula.ve \
    --cc=gordon@drogon.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).