linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
	Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>,
	"Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>,
	Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 000 of 3] MD Acceleration and the ADMA interface: Introduction
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:58:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43E3A7B8.2050607@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43E39F2B.5080408@drzeus.cx>

Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> 
>>The ADMA (Asynchronous / Application Specific DMA) interface is proposed
>>as a cross platform mechanism for supporting system CPU offload engines.
>>The goal is to provide a unified asynchronous interface to support
>>memory copies, block xor, block pattern setting, block compare, CRC
>>calculation, cryptography etc.  The ADMA interface should support a PIO
>>fallback mode allowing a given ADMA engine implementation to use the
>>system CPU for operations without a hardware accelerated backend.  In
>>other words a client coded to the ADMA interface transparently receives
>>hardware acceleration for its operations depending on the features of
>>the underlying platform.
>>
> 
> 
> I'm wondering, how common is this ADMA acronym? I've been writing a MMC

In ATA land, ADMA is a hardware ATA controller interface, similar to 
AHCI.  We even have a pdc_adma (Pacific Digital ADMA) driver in the 
tree, and NVIDIA uses a variant of the ADMA interface in their SATA 
controllers.

	Jeff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-03 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-03  1:46 [RFC][PATCH 000 of 3] MD Acceleration and the ADMA interface: Introduction Dan Williams
2006-02-03  2:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-03 18:21 ` Pierre Ossman
2006-02-03 18:25   ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-02-03 18:58   ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-02-06  3:30 ` Neil Brown
2006-02-06 19:25   ` Dan Williams
2006-02-07  7:23     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-02-14  3:29     ` Neil Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-03  1:12 Dan Williams
2006-02-03  1:25 ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43E3A7B8.2050607@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
    --cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=dsaxena@plexity.net \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).