From: David Liontooth <liontooth@cogweb.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Hard drive lifetime: wear from spinning up or rebooting vs running
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 15:42:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43E68D62.4080704@cogweb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0602022119380.12829-100000@firewall2.tmr.com>
In designing an archival system, we're trying to find data on when it
pays to power or spin the drives down versus keeping them running.
Is there a difference between spinning up the drives from sleep and from
a reboot? Leaving out the cost imposed on the (separate) operating
system drive.
Temperature obviously matters -- a linear approximation might look like
this,
Lifetime = 60 - 12 [(t-40)/2.5]
where 60 is the average maximum lifetime, achieved at 40 degrees C and
below, and lifetime decreases by a year for every 2.5 degree rise in
temperature. Does anyone have an actual formula?
To keep it simple, let's assume we keep temperature at or below what is
required to reach average maximum lifetime. What is the cost of spinning
up the drives in the currency of lifetime months?
My guess would be that the cost is tiny -- in the order of minutes.
Or are different components stressed in a running drive versus one that
is spinning up, so it's not possible to translate the cost of one into
the currency of the other?
Finally, is there passive decay of drive components in storage?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-05 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-02 5:59 RAID 16? David Liontooth
2006-02-02 6:03 ` Neil Brown
2006-02-02 8:34 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-02-02 16:17 ` Matthias Urlichs
2006-02-02 16:28 ` Mattias Wadenstein
2006-02-02 16:54 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-02-02 20:24 ` Matthias Urlichs
2006-02-02 21:18 ` J. Ryan Earl
2006-02-02 21:29 ` Andy Smith
2006-02-02 22:38 ` Konstantin Olchanski
2006-02-03 2:31 ` Ross Vandegrift
2006-02-03 2:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-02 18:42 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-02-02 20:34 ` Matthias Urlichs
2006-02-03 0:20 ` Guy
2006-02-03 0:59 ` David Liontooth
2006-02-02 16:44 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2006-02-03 9:08 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2006-02-03 2:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-05 23:42 ` David Liontooth [this message]
2006-02-06 3:57 ` Hard drive lifetime: wear from spinning up or rebooting vs running Konstantin Olchanski
2006-02-06 5:25 ` Patrik Jonsson
2006-02-06 4:35 ` Richard Scobie
2006-02-06 10:09 ` Mattias Wadenstein
2006-02-06 16:45 ` David Liontooth
2006-02-06 17:12 ` Francois Barre
2006-02-07 8:44 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2006-02-07 19:18 ` Neil Bortnak
2006-02-06 19:22 ` Brad Dameron
2006-02-06 21:15 ` Dan Stromberg
2009-09-20 19:44 ` RAID 16? Matthias Urlichs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43E68D62.4080704@cogweb.net \
--to=liontooth@cogweb.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).