From: Patrik Jonsson <patrik@ucolick.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hard drive lifetime: wear from spinning up or rebooting vs running
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:25:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43E6DDCD.7090007@ucolick.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060206035759.GB25631@sam.triumf.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 919 bytes --]
Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>>Does anyone have an actual formula?
>
>
> I doubt it, because it requires measuring lifetimes, which takes
> years, by which time the data are useless because the disks you used
> are obsolete.
I found this article on drive reliability from Seagate:
http://www.digit-life.com/articles/storagereliability/
They do indeed model the temperature derating as an exponential, such
that 25C is the reference temp and at 30C the MTBF is reduced to 78%.
Running the drive at 40C gives you half the lifetime.
Can't find anything about spinup/down though, but they do talk about how
MTBF depends on power-on hours per year, which should be a correlated
quantity. They assume the MTBF goes *up* the fewer POH/yr the drive has,
there's never any reduction due to excessive spinup/down, or at least
the reduction is never dominant. They also talk about the effect of duty
cycle.
cheers,
/Patrik
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-06 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-02 5:59 RAID 16? David Liontooth
2006-02-02 6:03 ` Neil Brown
2006-02-02 8:34 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-02-02 16:17 ` Matthias Urlichs
2006-02-02 16:28 ` Mattias Wadenstein
2006-02-02 16:54 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-02-02 20:24 ` Matthias Urlichs
2006-02-02 21:18 ` J. Ryan Earl
2006-02-02 21:29 ` Andy Smith
2006-02-02 22:38 ` Konstantin Olchanski
2006-02-03 2:31 ` Ross Vandegrift
2006-02-03 2:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-02 18:42 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-02-02 20:34 ` Matthias Urlichs
2006-02-03 0:20 ` Guy
2006-02-03 0:59 ` David Liontooth
2006-02-02 16:44 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2006-02-03 9:08 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2006-02-03 2:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-05 23:42 ` Hard drive lifetime: wear from spinning up or rebooting vs running David Liontooth
2006-02-06 3:57 ` Konstantin Olchanski
2006-02-06 5:25 ` Patrik Jonsson [this message]
2006-02-06 4:35 ` Richard Scobie
2006-02-06 10:09 ` Mattias Wadenstein
2006-02-06 16:45 ` David Liontooth
2006-02-06 17:12 ` Francois Barre
2006-02-07 8:44 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2006-02-07 19:18 ` Neil Bortnak
2006-02-06 19:22 ` Brad Dameron
2006-02-06 21:15 ` Dan Stromberg
2009-09-20 19:44 ` RAID 16? Matthias Urlichs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43E6DDCD.7090007@ucolick.org \
--to=patrik@ucolick.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).