From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Marques Subject: Re: Problems with invalid superblock Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:34:07 -0200 Message-ID: <43F6879F.6080601@scinergy.com.br> References: <43F64759.1060503@scinergy.com.br> <43F64EE5.7070408@fooplanet.com> <43F65E08.2020004@scinergy.com.br> <43F65F8E.1030505@fooplanet.com> Reply-To: william@scinergy.com.br Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <43F65F8E.1030505@fooplanet.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Gil Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gil escreveu: > William Marques wrote: >> Found something interesting in syslog: >> >> Feb 17 21:25:27 master kernel: md: bug in file drivers/md/md.c, line 1513 >> Feb 17 21:25:27 master kernel: >> Feb 17 21:25:27 master kernel: md:^I********************************** >> Feb 17 21:25:27 master kernel: md:^I* * >> Feb 17 21:25:27 master kernel: md:^I********************************** >> Feb 17 21:25:27 master kernel: md0: >> Feb 17 21:25:27 master kernel: md:^I********************************** >> Feb 17 21:25:27 master kernel: > > Not really. This is the sort of thing I would post back to the > list. Earlier I was just pointing out that mdadm -E was for the > components of a raid device, rather than the raid device itself. > > --Gil > ok, sorry abou that, I don realize tha I just not copy the list... done now. - -- William Marques Consultor Linux - TI LPIC-1: LPI000058633 Scinergy Consulting Ltda. Fone: +55 21 2224-3224 http://www.scinergy.com.br Rio de Janeiro - Brasil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD9oefbwzoNUPCOg8RAntqAJwKVWzUmD/x3l6ZVujOjoHoPuULAgCfQaTS ISGTnRcKnUUhsPy2iG7Q0EY= =0VkN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----