From: Mike Hardy <mhardy@h3c.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: No syncing after crash. Is this a software raid bug?
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 08:24:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4405CADA.3070204@h3c.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060301124432.GA3591@hactar.lan>
Why would you not be happy? resyncs in general are bad since they
indicate your data is possibly out-of-sync and the resync itself
consumes an enormous amount of resources
This is a feature of new-ish md driver code that more aggressively marks
the array as "clean" after writes
The end result is that the array will most likely be "clean" in all
circumstances even a crash, and you simply won't need to resync
That's a good thing!
-Mike
Kasper Dupont wrote:
> I have a FC4 installation (upgraded from FC3) using kernel
> version 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4. I see some symptoms in the software
> raid, which I'm not quite happy about.
>
> After an unclean shutdown caused by a crash or power failure,
> it does not resync the md devices. I have tried comparing the
> contents of the two mirrors for each of the md devices. And I
> found that on the swap device, there were differences.
>
> Isn't this a bug in the software raid? Shouldn't it always
> resync after reboot, if there could possibly be any difference
> between the contents on the two disks?
>
> I know that as long as only swap is affected, it is not going
> to cause data loss. But how can I be sure it is not going to
> happen on file systems as well?
>
> Should I report this as a bug in Fedora Core or did I miss
> something?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-01 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-01 12:44 No syncing after crash. Is this a software raid bug? Kasper Dupont
2006-03-01 13:58 ` Luca Berra
2006-03-01 16:24 ` Mike Hardy [this message]
2006-03-01 21:56 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-02 13:48 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 13:39 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-03 14:30 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 22:26 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-03 23:01 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04 9:01 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-04 10:10 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 7:30 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-03 12:03 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 12:38 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 14:48 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-03 15:10 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04 13:16 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-04 13:38 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04 19:50 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-07 10:47 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-07 11:18 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-07 12:12 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-10 7:43 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-10 7:49 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-16 7:24 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-16 14:04 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4405CADA.3070204@h3c.com \
--to=mhardy@h3c.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).