From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@steeleye.com>
To: Yogesh Pahilwan <pahilwan.yogesh@spsoftindia.com>
Cc: 'Neil Brown' <neilb@suse.de>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux MD RAID5/6 bitmap patches
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:07:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4422B99D.2030207@steeleye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <WM55FF1C4E77EA475bABFCC81C4DDCE4A9@spsoftindia.com>
Yogesh Pahilwan wrote:
> Where can we get documentation (design/implementation) about RAID6 and
> bitmap for linux kernel 2.6.
For the bitmap code, I'm afraid you'll just have to read the code. Also,
look back at the archives of this list. There are several discussions
about the bitmap patches, going back to 2003.
--
Paul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Clements [mailto:paul.clements@steeleye.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 11:37 PM
> To: Yogesh Pahilwan
> Cc: 'Neil Brown'; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Linux MD RAID5/6 bitmap patches
>
> Yogesh Pahilwan wrote:
>
>
>>Thanks for your reply. As far as what I understood that when we apply the
>>bitmap patch, for every write it will do 2 sync writes that is setting the
>>dirty bit, writing intent log and one async write for clearing the dirty
>>bit. Is it correct?
>
>
> The bits are in the intent log, so the "setting dirty bit" and "writing
> intent log" are the same thing. Just one write.
>
>
>>If that is the case are there any patches available which can do
>
> collection
>
>>of sync write in a queue and write a collection in single write request.
>>For Eg:
>>For 10 writes , we will have 10 + 1 sync writes + 10 async write.
>
>
> The bitmap code already does this by default. The bitmap writes are
> queued up so that all writes to a given page (within a short time
> period) are reduced to a single write. The performance is actually quite
> good. There's very little performance difference between having a bitmap
> versus not having one.
>
>
>>I mean to say , 10 sync writes for setting the dirty bits + 1 sync write
>
> for
>
>>write intent log for all queued request in one write operation + 10 async
>>write for clearing the dirty bit.
>
>
> The async writes for clearing the bitmap are also combined.
>
> --
> Paul
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-23 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-22 7:22 Linux MD RAID5/6 bitmap patches Yogesh Pahilwan
2006-03-22 10:06 ` Neil Brown
2006-03-22 10:48 ` Yogesh Pahilwan
2006-03-22 18:06 ` Paul Clements
2006-03-23 9:12 ` Yogesh Pahilwan
2006-03-23 15:07 ` Paul Clements [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-22 7:27 Yogesh Pahilwan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4422B99D.2030207@steeleye.com \
--to=paul.clements@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=pahilwan.yogesh@spsoftindia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).