linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Marc L. de Bruin" <marc@debruin.org>
To: dean gaudet <dean@arctic.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: md/mdadm fails to properly run on 2.6.15 after upgrading from 2.6.11
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:54:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <443A0F3A.90104@debruin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604090736170.4668@twinlark.arctic.org>

dean gaudet wrote:

>On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Marc L. de Bruin wrote:
>
>...
>  
>
>>Okay, just pressing Control-D continues the boot process and AFAIK the root
>>filesystemen actually isn't corrupt. Running e2fsck returns no errors and
>>booting 2.6.11 works just fine, but I have no clue why it picked the wrong
>>partitions to build md[01234].
>>
>>What could have happened here?
>>    
>>
>
>i didn't know sarge had 2.6.11 or 2.6.15 packages... but i'm going to 
>assume you've installed one of initramfs-tools or yaird in order to use 
>the unstable 2.6.11 or 2.6.15 packages... so my comments might not apply.
>  
>
You are right about this. Sarge does not contain 2.6.11 or 2.6.15. 
'linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp' depends on "initramfs-tools | yaird | 
linux-initramfs-tool". I picked initramfs-tools, but in the future I 
might go for yaird because initramfs-tools depends on udev and I may not 
want to lose hotplug.

>initramfs-tools generates an "mdrun /dev" which starts all the raids it 
>can find... but does not include the mdadm.conf in the initrd so i'm not 
>sure it will necessarily start them in the right minor devices.  try doing 
>an "mdadm --examine /dev/xxx" on some of your partitions to see if the 
>"preferred minor" is what you expect it to be...
>  
>
blah@frodo:~# sudo mdadm --examine /dev/md[01234]
mdadm: No super block found on /dev/md0 (Expected magic a92b4efc, got 
5e4cff37)
mdadm: No super block found on /dev/md1 (Expected magic a92b4efc, got 
940922e3)
mdadm: No super block found on /dev/md2 (Expected magic a92b4efc, got 
00000000)
mdadm: No super block found on /dev/md3 (Expected magic a92b4efc, got 
006c038d)
mdadm: No super block found on /dev/md4 (Expected magic a92b4efc, got 
00000000)
blah@frodo:~#

Is this a problem (for 2.6.15)? The system seems to work without a 
problem, at least with 2.6.11...

>if the preferred minors are wrong there's some mdadm incantation to update 
>them... see the man page.
>
>or switch to yaird (you'll have to install yaird and purge 
>initramfs-tools) and dpkg-reconfigure your kernel packages to cause the 
>initrds to be rebuilt.  yaird starts only the raid required for the root 
>filesystem, and specifies the correct minor for it.  then later after the 
>initrd /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid will start the rest of your raids using your 
>mdadm.conf.
>
Yeah, this is what is happening today with 2.6.11 as well.

Thanks for your time,

Marc.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-10  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-09 12:35 md/mdadm fails to properly run on 2.6.15 after upgrading from 2.6.11 Marc L. de Bruin
2006-04-09 14:46 ` Luca Berra
2006-04-09 14:47 ` dean gaudet
2006-04-10  7:54   ` Marc L. de Bruin [this message]
2006-04-10 15:44     ` dean gaudet
2006-04-10 18:03       ` Marc L. de Bruin
2006-04-10 18:35         ` dean gaudet
2006-04-10 21:05           ` Marc L. de Bruin
2006-04-11 21:13             ` dean gaudet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=443A0F3A.90104@debruin.org \
    --to=marc@debruin.org \
    --cc=dean@arctic.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).