From: Florian Dazinger <florian.dazinger@umit.at>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: problems with raid=noautodetect
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 14:41:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4471B188.3060400@umit.at> (raw)
hi list,
I read somewhere that it would be better not to rely on the
autodetect-mechanism in the kernel at boot time, but rather to set up
/etc/mdadm.conf accordingly and boot with raid=noautodetect. Well, I
tried that :)
I set up /etc/mdadm.conf for my 2 raid5 arrays:
---- snip ----
# mountpoint: /home/media
ARRAY /dev/md0
level=raid5
UUID=86ed1434:43380717:4abf124e:970d843a
devices=/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1,/dev/sdd3
# mountpoint: /mnt/raid
ARRAY /dev/md1
level=raid5
UUID=baf59fb5:f4805e7a:91a77644:af3dde17
# devices=/dev/sda2,/dev/sdb2,/dev/sdd2
---- snap ----
and rebooted with raid=noautodetect. It booted fine, but the 3rd disks
from each array (/dev/sdd2 and /dev/sdd3) were removed, so I had 2
degraded raid5 arrays. It was possible to readd them with sth. like:
mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/sdd3
(synced and /proc/mdstat showed [UUU])
but after the next reboot, the two partitions were again removed
([UU_])?! This was a reproducible error, I tried it several times with
different /etc/mdadm.conf settings (ARRAY-statement with UUID=,
devices=, UUID+devices, etc.).
I´m now running autodetect again, all raid arrays are working fine, but
can anyone explain this strange behaviour?
(kernel-2.6.16.14, amd64)
thanks,
florian
PS: please cc me, as I´m not subscribed to the list
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2006-05-22 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-22 12:41 Florian Dazinger [this message]
2006-05-22 22:39 ` problems with raid=noautodetect Neil Brown
2006-05-24 12:47 ` problems with raid=noautodetect - solved Florian Dazinger
2006-05-26 0:10 ` Nix
2006-05-26 7:53 ` problems with raid=noautodetect Luca Berra
2006-05-26 7:56 ` Luca Berra
2006-05-29 4:21 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-29 5:02 ` Luca Berra
2006-05-29 8:38 ` Michael Tokarev
2006-05-29 8:54 ` Luca Berra
2006-05-30 17:10 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-05-30 17:30 ` Luca Berra
2006-05-31 13:23 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4471B188.3060400@umit.at \
--to=florian.dazinger@umit.at \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).