From: "Nigel J. Terry" <nigel@nigelterry.net>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid5 reshape
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:21:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44945643.3070300@nigelterry.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17555.13409.834439.80361@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday June 16, nigel@nigelterry.net wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the advice. One final question, what kernel and mdadm
>> versions do I need?
>>
>
> For resizing raid5:
>
> mdadm-2.4 or later
> linux-2.6.17-rc2 or later
>
> NeilBrown
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
Ok, I tried and screwed up!
I upgraded my kernel and mdadm.
I set the grow going and all looked well, so as it said it was going to
take 430 minutes, I went to Starbucks. When I came home there had been a
power cut, but my UPS had shut the system down. When power returned I
rebooted. Now I think I had failed to set the new partition on /dev/hdc1
to Raid Autodetect, so it didn't find it at reboot. I tried to hot add
it, but now I seem to have a deadlock situation. Although --detail shows
that it is degraded and recovering, /proc/mdstat shows it is reshaping.
In truth there is no disk activity and the count in /proc/mdstat is not
changing. I gues sthe only good news is that I can still mount the
device and my data is fine. Please see below...
Any ideas what I should do next? Thanks
Nigel
[root@homepc ~]# uname -a
Linux homepc.nigelterry.net 2.6.17-rc6 #1 SMP Sat Jun 17 11:05:52 EDT
2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@homepc ~]# mdadm --version
mdadm - v2.5.1 - 16 June 2006
[root@homepc ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.91.03
Creation Time : Tue Apr 18 17:44:34 2006
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 490223104 (467.51 GiB 501.99 GB)
Device Size : 245111552 (233.76 GiB 250.99 GB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Sat Jun 17 15:15:05 2006
State : clean, degraded, recovering
Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 1
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 128K
Reshape Status : 6% complete
Delta Devices : 1, (3->4)
UUID : 50e3173e:b5d2bdb6:7db3576b:644409bb
Events : 0.3211829
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
2 3 65 2 active sync /dev/hdb1
3 0 0 3 removed
4 22 1 - spare /dev/hdc1
[root@homepc ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid5 sdb1[1] sda1[0] hdc1[4](S) hdb1[2]
490223104 blocks super 0.91 level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3]
[UUU_]
[=>...................] reshape = 6.9% (17073280/245111552)
finish=86.3min speed=44003K/sec
unused devices: <none>
[root@homepc ~]#
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-17 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-16 6:34 Raid5 reshape Tim
2006-06-16 6:41 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-16 16:00 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-16 16:14 ` Tim T
2006-06-16 22:28 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-16 22:39 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-16 22:44 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-17 19:21 ` Nigel J. Terry [this message]
2006-06-17 21:55 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-17 22:01 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-17 22:05 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-17 22:17 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-17 22:19 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-18 12:57 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-19 2:03 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-19 21:42 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-19 22:46 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-19 22:53 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-19 23:29 ` Mike Hardy
2006-06-19 23:33 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-19 23:33 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-19 23:35 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-20 10:35 ` Nigel J. Terry
2006-06-21 6:02 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-24 22:58 ` Raid5 reshape (Solved) Nigel J. Terry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44945643.3070300@nigelterry.net \
--to=nigel@nigelterry.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).