From: Adam Talbot <talbotx@comcast.net>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Francois Barre <francois.barre@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Large single raid and XFS or two small ones and EXT3?
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:59:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <449CF0D0.9080006@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17564.52087.651968.635043@cse.unsw.edu.au>
OK, this topic I relay need to get in on.
I have spent the last few week bench marking my new 1.2TB, 6 disk, RAID6
array. I wanted real numbers, not "This FS is faster because..." I have
moved over 100TB of data on my new array running the bench mark
testing. I have yet to have any major problems with ReiserFS, EXT2/3,
JFS, or XFS. I have done extensive testing on all, including just
trying to break the file system with billions of 1k files, or a 1TB
file. Was able to cause some problems with EXT3 and RiserFS with the 1KB
and 1TB tests, respectively. but both were fixed with a fsck. My basic
test is to move all data from my old server to my new server
(whitequeen2) and clock the transfer time. Whitequeen2 has very little
storage. The NAS's 1.2TB of storage is attached via iSCSI and a cross
over cable to the back of whitequeen2. The data is 100GB of user's
files(1KB~2MB), 50GB of MP3's (1MB~5MB) and the rest is movies and
system backups 600MB~2GB. Here is a copy of my current data sheet,
including specs on the servers and copy times, my numbers are not
perfect, but they should give you a clue about speeds... XFS wins.
The computer: whitequeen2
AMD Athlon64 3200 (2.0GHz)
1GB Corsair DDR 400 (2X 512MB's running in dual DDR mode)
Foxconn 6150K8MA-8EKRS motherboard
Off brand case/power supply
2X os disks, software raid array, RAID 1, Maxtor 51369U3, FW DA620CQ0
Intel pro/1000 NIC
CentOS 4.3 X86_64 2.6.9
Main app server, Apache, Samba, NFS, NIS
The computer: nas
AMD Athlon64 3000 (1.8GHz)
256MB Corsair DDR 400 (2X 128MB's running in dual DDR mode)
Foxconn 6150K8MA-8EKRS motherboard
Off brand case/power supply and drive cages
2X os disks, software raid array, RAID 1, Maxtor 51369U3, FW DA620CQ0
6X software raid array, RAID 6, Maxtor 7V300F0, FW VA111900
Gentoo linux. X86_64 2.6.16-gentoo-r9
System built very lite, only built as an iSCSI based NAS.
NFS mount from whitequeen (old server) goes to /mnt/tmp
Target iSCSI to NAS, or when running on local NAS, is /data
Raw dump /dev/null (Speed mark, how fast is the old whitequeen, Read test)
Config=APP+NFS-->/dev/null
[root@whitequeen2 tmp]# time tar cf - . | cat - > /dev/null
real 216m30.621s
user 1m24.222s
sys 15m20.031s
3.6 hours @ 105371M/hour or 1756M/min or *29.27M/sec*
XFS
Config=APP+NFS-->NAS+iSCSI
RAID6 64K chunk
[root@whitequeen2 tmp]# time tar cf - . | (cd /data ; tar xf - )
real 323m9.990s
user 1m28.556s
sys 31m6.405s
/dev/sdb1 1.1T 371G 748G 34% /data
5.399 hours @ 70,260M/hour or 1171M/min or 19.52M/sec
Pass 2 of XFS (are my number repeatable? Yes)
real 320m11.615s
user 1m26.997s
sys 31m11.987s
XFS (Direct NFS connection, no app server, max "real world" speed of my
array?)
Config=NAS+NFS
RAID6 64K chunk
nas tmp # time tar cf - . | (cd /data ; tar xf - )
real 241m8.698s
user 1m2.760s
sys 25m9.770s
/dev/md/0 1.1T 371G 748G 34% /data
4.417 hours @ 85,880M/hour or 1.431M/min or *23.86M/sec*
EXT3
Config=APP+NFS-->NAS+iSCSI
RAID6 64K chunk
[root@whitequeen2 tmp]# time tar cf - . | (cd /data ; tar xf - )
real 371m29.802s
user 1m28.492s
sys 46m48.947s
/dev/sdb1 1.1T 371G 674G 36% /data
6.192 hours @ 61,262M/hour or 1021M/min or 17.02M/sec
EXT2
Config=APP+NFS-->NAS+iSCSI
RAID6 64K chunk
[root@whitequeen2 tmp]# time tar cf - . | ( cd /data/ ; tar xf - )
real 401m48.702s
user 1m25.599s
sys 30m22.620s
/dev/sdb1 1.1T 371G 674G 36% /data
6.692 hours @ 56,684M/hour or 945M/min or 15.75M/sec
JFS
Config=APP+NFS-->NAS+iSCSI
RAID6 64K chunk
[root@whitequeen2 tmp]# time tar cf - . | (cd /data ; tar xf - )
real 337m52.125s
user 1m26.526s
sys 32m33.983s
/dev/sdb1 1.1T 371G 748G 34% /data
5.625 hours @ 67,438M/hour or 1124M/min or 18.73M/sec
ReiserFS
Config=APP+NFS-->NAS+iSCSI
RAID6 64K chunk
[root@whitequeen2 tmp]# time tar cf - . | (cd /data ; tar xf - )
real 334m33.615s
user 1m31.098s
sys 48m41.193s
/dev/sdb1 1.1T 371G 748G 34% /data
5.572 hours @ 68,078M/hour or 1135M/min or 18.91M/sec
Word count
[root@whitequeen2 tmp]# ls | wc
66612 301527 5237755
Actule size = 379,336M
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-24 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-22 19:11 Large single raid and XFS or two small ones and EXT3? Chris Allen
2006-06-22 19:16 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-06-22 19:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-06-22 19:58 ` Chris Allen
2006-06-22 20:00 ` Chris Allen
2006-06-23 8:59 ` PFC
2006-06-23 9:26 ` Francois Barre
2006-06-23 12:50 ` Chris Allen
2006-06-23 13:14 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-06-23 13:30 ` Francois Barre
2006-06-23 14:46 ` Martin Schröder
2006-06-23 14:59 ` Francois Barre
2006-06-23 15:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-06-23 15:34 ` Francois Barre
2006-06-23 19:49 ` Nix
2006-06-24 5:19 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-24 7:59 ` Adam Talbot [this message]
2006-06-24 9:34 ` David Greaves
2006-06-24 22:52 ` Adam Talbot
2006-06-25 13:06 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2006-06-28 3:45 ` I need a PCI V2.1 4 port SATA card Guy
2006-06-28 4:29 ` Brad Campbell
2006-06-28 10:20 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-06-28 11:55 ` Christian Pernegger
2006-06-28 11:59 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-06-29 18:45 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-06-28 19:38 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-06-28 12:12 ` Petr Vyskocil
2006-06-25 14:51 ` Large single raid and XFS or two small ones and EXT3? Adam Talbot
2006-06-25 20:35 ` Chris Allen
2006-06-25 23:57 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-06-26 0:42 ` Adam Talbot
2006-06-26 14:03 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-06-24 12:40 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-06-26 0:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-06-26 8:06 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-06-23 15:17 ` Chris Allen
2006-06-23 14:01 ` Al Boldi
2006-06-23 16:06 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-06-23 16:41 ` Christian Pedaschus
2006-06-23 16:46 ` Christian Pedaschus
2006-06-23 19:53 ` Nix
2006-06-23 16:21 ` Russell Cattelan
2006-06-23 18:19 ` Tom Vier
2006-06-27 12:05 ` Large single raid... - XFS over NFS woes Dexter Filmore
2006-06-23 19:48 ` Large single raid and XFS or two small ones and EXT3? Nix
2006-06-25 19:13 ` David Rees
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=449CF0D0.9080006@comcast.net \
--to=talbotx@comcast.net \
--cc=francois.barre@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).