From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Resizing RAID-1 arrays - some possible bugs and problems
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:58:06 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44AEE6FE.20900@reub.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17582.56369.13427.473503@cse.unsw.edu.au>
On 8/07/2006 10:12 a.m., Neil Brown wrote:
> On Saturday July 8, reuben-lkml@reub.net wrote:
>> And lastly, I felt brave and decided to plunge ahead, resize to 128 blocks
>> smaller than the device size. mdadm --grow /dev/md1 --size=
>>
>> The kernel then went like this:
>>
>> md: couldn't update array info. -28
>> VFS: busy inodes on changed media.
>> md1: invalid bitmap page request: 150 (> 149)
>> md1: invalid bitmap page request: 150 (> 149)
>> md1: invalid bitmap page request: 150 (> 149)
>
> Oh dear, that's bad.
>
> I guess I didn't think through resizing of an array with an active
> bitmap properly... :-(
> That won't be fixed in a hurry I'm afraid.
> You'll need to remove the bitmap before the grow and re-add it
> afterwards, which isn't really ideal.
> I'll look at making this more robust when I return from vacation in a
> week or so.
>
> NeilBrown
Thanks for the response and references to the manpage, Neil. I had misread the
reference to 'max' and not realised it was a keyword/option that could be passed
to --size.
I disabled bitmaps and the machine went into a bit of a spin. It returned
immediately at the prompt when I removed the bitmap (--bitmap=none) but each
session locked up as soon as I attempted any sort of disk I/O, ie attempting
things like 'df' or using 'less' which is mounted on the root filesystem on md0
which is one I was disabling bitmaps on. I had to power cycle the box to get a
response from it.
Nothing was logged in /var/log/messages so unfortunately I've not anything to
work with on it. But I guess it further suggests that it was the disk I/O that
did fall over.
Then I rebooted into single user mode, noticed that the system had in fact
removed the bitmaps, and did my resize using --size=max. It worked! Now I can
move on to resizing the filesystems themselves.
In other news, last night I requested an upgrade of mdadm in Fedora Core/Devel
and this has since been done, so 2.5.2 should come through tonight in the
nightly FC build (and of course be in FC6 when it comes out).
reuben
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-07 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-07 13:40 Resizing RAID-1 arrays - some possible bugs and problems Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-07 18:52 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-07 21:10 ` Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-07 22:12 ` Neil Brown
2006-07-07 22:58 ` Reuben Farrelly [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44AEE6FE.20900@reub.net \
--to=reuben-lkml@reub.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).