linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@steeleye.com>
To: Janos Farkas <chexum+dev@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mdadm -X bitmap status off by 2^16
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:30:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44BCFEA2.20301@steeleye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <priv$efbe06145625$36d67b3763@200607.gmail.com>

Janos Farkas wrote:

> # for i in hdb3 hdd3 hda3 ; mdadm -X /dev/$i|grep map
>           Bitmap : 285923 bits (chunks), 0 dirty (0.0%)
>           Bitmap : 285923 bits (chunks), 0 dirty (0.0%)
>           Bitmap : 285923 bits (chunks), 65536 dirty (22.9%)

This indicates that the _on-disk_ bits are cleared on two disks, but set 
on the third.


> # cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md0 : active raid5 hdd3[2] hdb3[0] hda3[1]
>       585569024 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]
>       bitmap: 0/140 pages [0KB], 1024KB chunk

This indicates that the _in-memory_ bits are all cleared.

At array startup, md initializes the in-memory bitmap from the on-disk 
copy. It then uses the in-memory bitmap from that point on, shadowing 
any changes there into the on-disk bitmap.

At the end of a rebuild (which should have happened after you added the 
third disk), the bits should all be cleared. The on-disk bits get 
cleared lazily, though. Is there any chance that they are cleared now? 
If not, it sounds like a bug to me.

--
Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-18 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-18  6:46 mdadm -X bitmap status off by 2^16 Janos Farkas
2006-07-18 15:30 ` Paul Clements [this message]
2006-07-18 16:54   ` Janos Farkas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44BCFEA2.20301@steeleye.com \
    --to=paul.clements@steeleye.com \
    --cc=chexum+dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).