From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
To: Shane <shane@cm.nu>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raid5/lvm setup questions
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 18:31:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44D4D5F9.9080201@dgreaves.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060805165358.GA29177@cm.nu>
Shane wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm building a new server which will use a number of disks
> and am not sure of the best way to go about the setup.
> There will be 4 320gb SATA drives installed at first. I'm
> just wondering how to set the system up for upgradability.
> I'll be using raid5 but not sure whether to use lvm over
> the raid array.
>
> By upgradability, I'd like to do several things. Adding
> another drive of the same size to the array. I understand
> reshape can be used here to expand the underlying block
> device.
Yes, it can.
If the block device is the pv of an lvm array,
> would that also automatically expand in which I would
> create additional lvs in the new space. If this isn't
> automatic, are there ways to do it manually?
Not automatic AFAIK - but doable.
> What about replacing all four drives with larger units.
> Say going from 300gbx4 to 500gbx4. Can one replace them
> one at a time, going through fail/rebuild as appropriate
> and then expand the array into the unused space
Yes.
or would
> one have to reinstall at that point.
No
None of the requirements above drive you to layering lvm over the top.
That's not to say don't do it - but you certainly don't *need* to do it.
Pros:
* allows snapshots (for consistent backups)
* allows various lvm block movements etc...
* Can later grow vg to use discrete additional block devices without raid5 grow
limitations (eg same-ish size disks etc)
Cons:
* extra complexity -> risk of bugs/admin errors...
* performance impact
As an example of the cons: I've just set up lvm2 over my raid5 and whilst
testing snapshots, the first thing that happened was a kernel BUG and an oops...
David
next parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-05 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060805165358.GA29177@cm.nu>
2006-08-05 17:31 ` David Greaves [this message]
[not found] ` <20060805175908.GA31024@cm.nu>
2006-08-05 21:02 ` raid5/lvm setup questions Martin Schröder
2006-08-07 23:29 ` Neil Brown
2006-08-07 19:57 ` Nix
[not found] ` <20060807200455.GA29837@cm.nu>
2006-08-07 20:20 ` Chet McNeill
2006-08-07 22:28 ` David Greaves
2006-08-07 22:32 ` David Greaves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44D4D5F9.9080201@dgreaves.com \
--to=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shane@cm.nu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).