From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Peverill <jamespev@net1plus.com>
Subject: Re: Resize on dirty array?
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:33:16 -0400
Message-ID: <44D9E41C.4050608@net1plus.com>
References: <44D7DC93.2070905@net1plus.com>
 <17623.57067.835826.446152@cse.unsw.edu.au>  <44D8E535.9080208@net1plus.com>
 <17625.24594.568139.430440@cse.unsw.edu.au>  <44D9C6F5.7070501@net1plus.com>
 <68c491a60608090437l7e3b583el2214cbe6f01009ab@mail.gmail.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608090846160.16324@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608090846160.16324@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids


In this case the raid WAS the backup... however it seems it turned out 
to be less reliable than the single disks it was supporting.  In the 
future I think I'll make sure my disks have varying ages so they don't 
fail all at once.

James

>> RAID is no excuse for backups.
PS: <ctrl><pgup>