From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: checking md device parity (forced resync) - is it necessary?
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:00:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44FD66C3.6040609@wpkg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17661.19907.140798.943518@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Neil Brown wrote:
(...)
>> Which starts a resync of drives. As one can imagine, resync of 800 GB on
>> a rather slow device (600 MHz ARM) can take 12 hours or so...
>>
>
> I believe that was intended to be once a month, not once a day.
> Slight error in crontab.
>
>> So my question is: is this "daily forced resync" necessary?
>
> Daily is probably excessive, certainly on an array that size.
>
> Monthly is good. Weekly might be justified on cheap (i.e. unreliable)
> drives and very critical data.
>
> With RAID, sleeping bad blocks can be bad. If you hit one while
> recovering a failed drive, you have to put the piece back together by
> hand.
> A regular check can wake up those sleeping bad blocks.
Thanks a lot for clarification.
>> When can one need to run a "daily forced resync", and in which
>> circumstances?
>
> As I said, I think the 'daily' is an error. What exactly do you have
> in crontab??
Indeed, the crontab entry is wrong:
# by default, run at 01:06 on the first Sunday of each month.
6 1 1-7 * 7 root [ -x /usr/share/mdadm/checkarray ] &&
/usr/share/mdadm/checkarray --cron --all --quiet
However, it will run at 01:06, on 1st-7th day of each month, and on
Sundays (Debian etch).
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-05 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-05 8:59 checking md device parity (forced resync) - is it necessary? Tomasz Chmielewski
2006-09-05 10:13 ` Neil Brown
2006-09-05 12:00 ` Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2006-09-05 16:59 ` Luca Berra
2006-09-06 7:19 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-09-06 8:12 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2006-09-06 13:55 ` John Stoffel
2006-09-06 14:11 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44FD66C3.6040609@wpkg.org \
--to=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).