linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: John Rowe <rowe@excc.ex.ac.uk>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New features?
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:19:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4547A1A8.7000106@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162293818.32109.113.camel@kenny>

John Rowe wrote:

>All this discussion has led me to wonder if we users of linux RAID have
>a clear consensus of what our priorities are, ie what are the things we
>really want to see soon as opposed to the many things that would be nice
>but not worth delaying the important things for. FWIW, here are mine, in
>order although the first two are roughly equal priority.
>
>1 "Warm swap" - replacing drives without taking down the array but maybe
>having to type in a few commands. Presumably a sata or sata/raid
>interface issue. (True hot swap is nice but not worth delaying warm-
>swap.)
>  
>
That seems to work now. It does assume that you have hardware hot swap 
capability.

>2 Adding new disks to arrays. Allows incremental upgrades and to take
>advantage of the hard disk equivalent of Moore's law.
>  
>
Also seems to work.

>3. RAID level conversion (1 to 5, 5 to 6, with single-disk to RAID 1 a
>lower priority).
>  
>
Single to RAID-N is possible, but involves a good bit of magic with 
leaving room for superblocks, etc.

>4. Uneven disk sizes, eg adding a 400GB disk to a 2x200GB mirror to
>create a 400GB mirror. Together with 2 and 3, allows me to continuously
>expand a disk array.
>  
>
???

-- 

bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO TMR Associates, Inc
  Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-31 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-31 11:23 New features? John Rowe
2006-10-31 11:50 ` Neil Brown
2006-10-31 12:09   ` John Rowe
2006-10-31 16:50   ` Mike Hardy
2006-10-31 21:41     ` Frido Ferdinand
2006-11-29  1:23   ` mdadm --assemble weirdness? Patrik Jonsson
2006-11-29  2:15     ` Neil Brown
2006-11-29  4:06       ` Patrik Jonsson
2006-11-29 19:59         ` Patrik Jonsson
2006-11-30 22:26           ` --no-degraded in mdadm.conf? Patrik Jonsson
2006-10-31 19:19 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-31 21:43 New features? Frido Ferdinand
2006-11-03  3:39 ` Neil Brown
2006-11-03  9:33   ` Gabor Gombas
2006-11-10  0:48     ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4547A1A8.7000106@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rowe@excc.ex.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).