From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: John Rowe <rowe@excc.ex.ac.uk>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New features?
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:19:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4547A1A8.7000106@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162293818.32109.113.camel@kenny>
John Rowe wrote:
>All this discussion has led me to wonder if we users of linux RAID have
>a clear consensus of what our priorities are, ie what are the things we
>really want to see soon as opposed to the many things that would be nice
>but not worth delaying the important things for. FWIW, here are mine, in
>order although the first two are roughly equal priority.
>
>1 "Warm swap" - replacing drives without taking down the array but maybe
>having to type in a few commands. Presumably a sata or sata/raid
>interface issue. (True hot swap is nice but not worth delaying warm-
>swap.)
>
>
That seems to work now. It does assume that you have hardware hot swap
capability.
>2 Adding new disks to arrays. Allows incremental upgrades and to take
>advantage of the hard disk equivalent of Moore's law.
>
>
Also seems to work.
>3. RAID level conversion (1 to 5, 5 to 6, with single-disk to RAID 1 a
>lower priority).
>
>
Single to RAID-N is possible, but involves a good bit of magic with
leaving room for superblocks, etc.
>4. Uneven disk sizes, eg adding a 400GB disk to a 2x200GB mirror to
>create a 400GB mirror. Together with 2 and 3, allows me to continuously
>expand a disk array.
>
>
???
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-31 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-31 11:23 New features? John Rowe
2006-10-31 11:50 ` Neil Brown
2006-10-31 12:09 ` John Rowe
2006-10-31 16:50 ` Mike Hardy
2006-10-31 21:41 ` Frido Ferdinand
2006-11-29 1:23 ` mdadm --assemble weirdness? Patrik Jonsson
2006-11-29 2:15 ` Neil Brown
2006-11-29 4:06 ` Patrik Jonsson
2006-11-29 19:59 ` Patrik Jonsson
2006-11-30 22:26 ` --no-degraded in mdadm.conf? Patrik Jonsson
2006-10-31 19:19 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-31 21:43 New features? Frido Ferdinand
2006-11-03 3:39 ` Neil Brown
2006-11-03 9:33 ` Gabor Gombas
2006-11-10 0:48 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4547A1A8.7000106@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rowe@excc.ex.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).