From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Isn't raid1 obsolete by raid10 module?
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:40:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45645334.4070203@tls.msk.ru> (raw)
Just out of curiosity. It looks like raid10 module
provides all the functionality of raid1 too. For
example, for a 2-component raid1 array, the two:
mdadm -C -l1 -n2 /dev/md1 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1
and
mdadm -C -l10 -n2 -ln2 /dev/md1 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1
will create the same array. Ditto for e.g 3-component
raid1:
mdadm -C -l1 -n3 /dev/md1 /dev/sd{a,b,c}1
and
mdadm -C -l10 -n3 -ln3 /dev/md1 /dev/sd{a,b,c}1
will do the same.
Shouldn't raid1 module be removed from kernel? :)
/mjt
reply other threads:[~2006-11-22 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45645334.4070203@tls.msk.ru \
--to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).