From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>
To: linux-raid list <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: slow 'check'
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:41:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45CD5B26.5030707@eyal.emu.id.au> (raw)
I have a six-disk RAID5 over sata. First two disks are on the mobo and last four
are on a Promise SATA-II-150-TX4. The sixth disk was added recently and I decided
to run a 'check' periodically, and started one manually to see how long it should
take. Vanilla 2.6.20.
A 'dd' test shows:
# dd if=/dev/md0 of=/dev/null bs=1024k count=10240
10240+0 records in
10240+0 records out
10737418240 bytes transferred in 84.449870 seconds (127145468 bytes/sec)
This is good for this setup. A check shows:
$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdf1[5] sde1[4] sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1]
1562842880 blocks level 5, 256k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
[>....................] check = 0.8% (2518144/312568576) finish=2298.3min speed=2246K/sec
unused devices: <none>
which is an order of magnitude slower (the speed is per-disk, call it 13MB/s
for the six). There is no activity on the RAID. Is this expected? I assume
that the simple dd does the same amount of work (don't we check parity on
read?).
I have these tweaked at bootup:
echo 4096 >/sys/block/md0/md/stripe_cache_size
blockdev --setra 32768 /dev/md0
Changing the above parameters seems to not have a significant effect.
The check logs the following:
md: data-check of RAID array md0
md: minimum _guaranteed_ speed: 1000 KB/sec/disk.
md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than 200000 KB/sec) for data-check.
md: using 128k window, over a total of 312568576 blocks.
Does it need a larger window (whatever a window is)? If so, can it
be set dynamically?
TIA
--
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au) <http://samba.org/eyal/>
attach .zip as .dat
next reply other threads:[~2007-02-10 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-10 5:41 Eyal Lebedinsky [this message]
2007-02-10 7:41 ` slow 'check' Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
2007-02-10 9:57 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2007-02-10 20:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-10 9:25 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-02-10 10:15 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2007-02-10 10:23 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-02-10 20:35 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-11 9:30 ` Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
2007-02-14 16:41 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45CD5B26.5030707@eyal.emu.id.au \
--to=eyal@eyal.emu.id.au \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).