From: Steve Cousins <steve.cousins@maine.edu>
To: Colin Simpson <csimpson@csl.co.uk>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:55:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45DF46B7.3040707@maine.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1172258378.21648.51.camel@cowie>
Colin Simpson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We had a small server here that was configured with a RAID 1 mirror,
> using two IDE disks.
>
> Last week one of the drives failed in this. So we replaced the drive and
> set the array to rebuild. The "good" disk then found a bad block and the
> mirror failed.
>
> Now I presume that the "good" disk must have had an underlying bad block
> in either unallocated space or a file I never access. Now as RAID works
> at the block level you only ever see this on an array rebuild when it's
> often catastrophic. Is this a bit of a flaw?
>
> I know there is the definite probability of two drives failing within a
> short period of time. But this is a bit different as it's the
> probability of two drives failing but over a much larger time scale if
> one of the flaws is hidden in unallocated space (maybe a dirt particle
> finds it's way onto the surface or something). This would make RAID buy
> you a lot less in reliability, I'd have thought.
>
> I seem to remember seeing in the log file for a Dell perc something
> about scavenging for bad blocks. Do hardware RAID systems have a
> mechanism that at times of low activity search the disks for bad blocks
> to help guard against this sort of failure (so a disk error is reported
> early)?
>
> On Software RAID, I was thinking apart from a three way mirror, which I
> don't think is at present supported. Is there any merit in say, cat'ing
> the whole disk devices to /dev/null every so often to check that the
> whole surface is readable (I presume just reading the raw device won't
> upset thing, don't worry I don't plan on trying it on a production
> system).
>
> Any thoughts? As I presume people have thought of this before and I must
> be missing something.
Yes, this is an important thing to keep on top of, both for hardware
RAID and software RAID. For md:
echo check > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action
This should be done regularly. I have cron do it once a week.
Check out: http://neil.brown.name/blog/20050727141521-002
Good luck,
Steve
--
______________________________________________________________________
Steve Cousins, Ocean Modeling Group Email: cousins@umit.maine.edu
Marine Sciences, 452 Aubert Hall http://rocky.umeoce.maine.edu
Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 Phone: (207) 581-4302
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-23 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-23 19:19 Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness? Colin Simpson
2007-02-23 19:55 ` Steve Cousins [this message]
2007-02-23 20:08 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-02-25 12:24 ` Colin Simpson
2007-02-25 19:15 ` Richard Scobie
2007-02-25 20:08 ` Mark Hahn
2007-02-25 21:02 ` Richard Scobie
2007-02-26 16:56 ` David Rees
2007-02-26 17:26 ` Colin Simpson
2007-02-26 19:40 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2007-02-26 21:13 ` David Rees
2007-02-26 21:22 ` Neil Brown
2007-02-27 20:12 ` David Rees
2007-02-26 22:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-27 4:10 ` berk walker
2007-02-23 20:25 ` Neil Brown
2007-02-24 4:14 ` Richard Scobie
2007-02-25 20:08 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45DF46B7.3040707@maine.edu \
--to=steve.cousins@maine.edu \
--cc=csimpson@csl.co.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).