linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Colin Simpson <csimpson@csl.co.uk>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness?
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:08:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45E1ECB3.1060204@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1172258378.21648.51.camel@cowie>

Colin Simpson wrote:
> Hi, 
>
> We had a small server here that was configured with a RAID 1 mirror,
> using two IDE disks. 
>
> Last week one of the drives failed in this. So we replaced the drive and
> set the array to rebuild. The "good" disk then found a bad block and the
> mirror failed.
>
> Now I presume that the "good" disk must have had an underlying bad block
> in either unallocated space or a file I never access. Now as RAID works
> at the block level you only ever see this on an array rebuild when it's
> often catastrophic. Is this a bit of a flaw? 
>
> I know there is the definite probability of two drives failing within a
> short period of time. But this is a bit different as it's the
> probability of two drives failing but over a much larger time scale if
> one of the flaws is hidden in unallocated space (maybe a dirt particle
> finds it's way onto the surface or something). This would make RAID buy
> you a lot less in reliability, I'd have thought. 
>
> I seem to remember seeing in the log file for a Dell perc something
> about scavenging for bad blocks. Do hardware RAID systems have a
> mechanism that at times of low activity search the disks for bad blocks
> to help guard against this sort of failure (so a disk error is reported
> early)?
>
> On Software RAID, I was thinking apart from a three way mirror, which I
> don't think is at present supported. Is there any merit in say, cat'ing
> the whole disk devices to /dev/null every so often to check that the
> whole surface is readable (I presume just reading the raw device won't
> upset thing, don't worry I don't plan on trying it on a production
> system). 
>
> Any thoughts? As I presume people have thought of this before and I must
> be missing something.
Multi-way mirror is supported, my boot partition is striped over three 
drives.

How often were you running the "check" function on your array, and did 
anything show up in the S.M.A.R.T. background checks?

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO TMR Associates, Inc
  Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979



      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-25 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-23 19:19 Linux Software RAID a bit of a weakness? Colin Simpson
2007-02-23 19:55 ` Steve Cousins
2007-02-23 20:08   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-02-25 12:24   ` Colin Simpson
2007-02-25 19:15     ` Richard Scobie
2007-02-25 20:08       ` Mark Hahn
2007-02-25 21:02         ` Richard Scobie
2007-02-26 16:56       ` David Rees
2007-02-26 17:26         ` Colin Simpson
2007-02-26 19:40           ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2007-02-26 21:13           ` David Rees
2007-02-26 21:22             ` Neil Brown
2007-02-27 20:12               ` David Rees
2007-02-26 22:38           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-27  4:10         ` berk walker
2007-02-23 20:25 ` Neil Brown
2007-02-24  4:14   ` Richard Scobie
2007-02-25 20:08 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45E1ECB3.1060204@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=csimpson@csl.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).