From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: mschwarz@multitool.net
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Failed reads from RAID-0 array; still no joy in Mudville.
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 12:22:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45FD753F.6050804@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2760.72.21.237.163.1174159273.squirrel@www.multitool.net>
Michael Schwarz wrote:
> Update:
>
> (For those who've been waiting breathlessly). It hangs at a particular
> point in a particular file. In other words, it doesn't depend on the total
> number of bytes transfered. Rather, when it reaches a particular point in
> a particular file (12267520 bytes into a file that is 1073709056 bytes
> long) it hangs.
>
I have an odd thought, have you tried copying that same file to
/dev/null or similar? The reason I ask is that if it were by any chance
a sparse file, while the program is reading all those unwritten bytes
odd things may happen. Sorry, I haven't seen this is years, but I do
remember seeing a filesystem on the destination end running out of space
because all those unwritten pages were now being "really written" as zeros.
Use of cp with the --sparse= flag may change the behavior if this is the
case.
> I begin to suspect that I have a "dead spot" in my USB hub. But what gets
> me if that is true is why does the write work? Do cp and dd not check to
> see if writes succeed?
>
> I know it isn't a particular flash drive because I've used two different
> sets of 7 USB drives and it seems to fail consistently no matter which.
>
> Nonetheless, I'm beginning to think I'm dealing with a hardware issue, not
> a kernel issue, just because it is so consistent.
>
> Thanks again for all the help.
>
>
>
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-18 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-17 2:20 Failed reads from RAID-0 array (from newbie who has read the FAQ) Michael Schwarz
2007-03-17 5:31 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-17 18:01 ` Michael Schwarz
2007-03-17 20:49 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-17 21:35 ` Michael Schwarz
2007-03-18 2:06 ` [Linux-usb-users] " Alan Stern
2007-03-18 2:12 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-18 4:42 ` Michael Schwarz
2007-03-18 16:56 ` [Linux-usb-users] " Michael Schwarz
2007-03-18 17:44 ` Michael Schwarz
2007-03-18 21:55 ` Michael Schwarz
2007-03-18 21:57 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-19 3:27 ` Michael Schwarz
2007-03-19 14:29 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-19 14:54 ` [Linux-usb-users] " Michael Schwarz
2007-03-19 15:31 ` Alan Stern
2007-03-19 16:58 ` Michael Schwarz
2007-03-19 18:17 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <45FC33A4.2090408@tmr.com>
2007-03-17 19:13 ` Failed reads from RAID-0 array; still no joy in Mudville Michael Schwarz
2007-03-17 19:21 ` Michael Schwarz
2007-03-18 17:22 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2007-03-18 17:39 ` Michael Schwarz
2007-03-18 18:21 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45FD753F.6050804@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mschwarz@multitool.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).