From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Colin McCabe <colin.p.mccabe@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unreadable drives can be synchronized?
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:22:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464B3DC2.9090806@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7296208f0705160850u74d9b52en835d3c9b21f54728@mail.gmail.com>
Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am running software RAID on Linux 2.6.21.
>
> While experimenting with adding and removing devices from the RAID
> array, I
> noticed something very troubling. I have a bad drive (let's call it
> drive B)
> which gets random read errors. I also have a good drive, call it drive A.
>
> B can synchronize with A. But then, if I remove A from the raid array, A
> cannot be re-added. This is because the bad drive, B, cannot be read
> from.
>
> Basically, B appears to be "write-only"; it will never return an error
> on a
> write, but just try to read from it, and you will be sorry.
>
You may be able to recover from this (why would you do such a thing?) by
stopping the array and reassembling the array with only the "good" drive
and the other as failed. Caution, I made this up, it should work but I
have no bad drive to use for a test, we have a good recycling system in
my area.
> Writing is fine:
> [root@cmccabe-devel root]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=524288
> dd: writing `/dev/sdb': No space left on device
> 114464+0 records in
> 114463+0 records out
>
> Reading is not:
> [root@cmccabe-devel root]# dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=524288
> ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x3 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
> ata1.00: cmd 60/00:00:00:b0:01/01:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data
> 131072 in
> [ ... copious errors ... ]
>
> I have disabled write caching using hdparm -W0.
> Both drives are: Fujitsu MHV2060BH, 60 GB, Serial ATA
> The SATA controller is: ICH6
>
> My problem is that even though B gets into the synchronized state, it
> is no
> good at all. This is potentially misleading, and if someone removes A
> after
> synchronizing B, the system will probably crash, since there will be
> no good
> drives left.
>
> I wonder if anyone else is interested in a "paranoid recovery" mode
> where the
> md layer tests the data that has been written. Even if this doubles the
> recovery time, I think that it would be desirable for many applications.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-16 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-16 15:50 unreadable drives can be synchronized? Colin McCabe
2007-05-16 17:22 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2007-05-16 20:09 ` Colin McCabe
2007-05-16 20:18 ` Colin McCabe
2007-05-17 0:54 ` Neil Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-18 14:47 Andrew Burgess
2007-05-18 15:04 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2007-05-18 18:18 ` Colin McCabe
2007-05-23 17:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-18 18:10 ` Colin McCabe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464B3DC2.9090806@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=colin.p.mccabe@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).