Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@rabbit.us>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:36:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46837307.20005@rabbit.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706280426500.1406@p34.internal.lan>

Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> 
>> Interesting, I came up with the same results (1M chunk being superior) 
>> with a completely different raid set with XFS on top:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Could it be attributed to XFS itself?
>>
>> Peter
>>
> 
> Good question, by the way how much cache do the drives have that you are 
> testing with?
> 

I believe 8MB, but I am not sure I am looking at the right number:

root@Arzamas:~# hdparm -i /dev/sda

/dev/sda:

  Model=aMtxro7 2Y050M                          , FwRev=AY5RH10W, 
SerialNo=6YB6Z7E4
  Config={ Fixed }
  RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
  BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=7936kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?0?
  CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455
  IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
  PIO modes:  pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
  DMA modes:  mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
  UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
  AdvancedPM=yes: disabled (255) WriteCache=enabled
  Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-7 T13 1532D revision 0:  ATA/ATAPI-1 
ATA/ATAPI-2 ATA/ATAPI-3 ATA/ATAPI-4 ATA/ATAPI-5 ATA/ATAPI-6 ATA/ATAPI-7

  * signifies the current active mode

root@Arzamas:~#

1M chunk consistently delivered best performance with:

o A plain dumb dd run
o bonnie
o two bonnie threads
o iozone with 4 threads

My RA is set at 256 for the drives and 16384 for the array (128k and 8M 
respectively)

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-28  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-27 23:20 Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k Justin Piszcz
2007-06-27 23:20 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-27 23:24   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  5:08   ` David Chinner
2007-06-28  7:53     ` David Greaves
2007-06-28  8:07     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  3:43 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-28  8:07   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  8:24     ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-06-28  8:27       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  8:36         ` Peter Rabbitson [this message]
2007-06-28  8:38           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-07-03  4:23             ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2007-07-03  8:42               ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  8:42           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28  8:46             ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28 22:05         ` David Chinner
2007-06-28  9:05       ` Matti Aarnio
2007-06-28 11:19         ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-28 13:27         ` Jon Nelson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46837307.20005@rabbit.us \
    --to=rabbit@rabbit.us \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox