From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: factor out bio_check_eod() Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:18:24 +0900 Message-ID: <469DF700.4030806@gmail.com> References: <18006.38689.818186.221707@notabene.brown> <18010.12472.209452.148229@notabene.brown> <20070530093503.GA15559@kernel.dk> <20070718105655.GB22374@htj.dyndns.org> <20070718105946.GC22374@htj.dyndns.org> <20070718110619.GM11657@kernel.dk> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070718110619.GM11657@kernel.dk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Jens Axboe Cc: David Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Susi , Andreas Dilger List-Id: linux-raid.ids Jens Axboe wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18 2007, Tejun Heo wrote: >> End of device check is done twice in __generic_make_request() and it's >> fully inlined each time. Factor out bio_check_eod(). > > Tejun, yeah I should seperate the cleanups and put them in the upstream > branch. Will do so and add your signed-off to both of them. > Would they be different from the one I just posted? No big deal either way. I'm just basing the zero-length barrier on top of these patches. Oh well, the changes are trivial anyway. -- tejun