From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
Subject: Re: RAID 5 performance issue.
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:48:45 +1300
Message-ID: <4704002D.9080100@sauce.co.nz>
References: <20071003105321.06943824@zeus.pccl.info>	<87r6kcccfv.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <20071003212037.1c983765@alpha.digital-domain.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071003212037.1c983765@alpha.digital-domain.net>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Andrew Clayton wrote:

> Yeah, I was wondering about that. It certainly hasn't improved things,
> it's unclear if it's made things any worse..
> 

Many 3124 cards are PCI-X, so if you have one of these (and you seem to 
be using a server board which may well have PCI-X), bus performance is 
not going to be an issue.

Regards,

Richard