From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Cousins Subject: Re: RAID 5 performance issue. Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:46:05 -0400 Message-ID: <470518CD.10405@maine.edu> References: <20071003105321.06943824@zeus.pccl.info> <20071003211910.439ded54@alpha.digital-domain.net> <72dbd3150710031336s331782c3yd0ac7ceda4e81774@mail.gmail.com> <20071004150831.6edbf926@zeus.pccl.info> <20071004153656.16e10f9e@zeus.pccl.info> <20071004160316.5332a370@zeus.pccl.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071004160316.5332a370@zeus.pccl.info> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Clayton Cc: Justin Piszcz , David Rees , Andrew Clayton , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Andrew Clayton wrote: > On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:39:09 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote: > > > >> What type (make/model) of the drives? >> > > The drives are 250GB Hitachi Deskstar 7K250 series ATA-6 UDMA/100 > A couple of things: 1. I thought you had SATA drives 2. ATA-6 would be UDMA/133 The SATA-1 versions of the 7K250's did not have NCQ. The SATA-2 versions do have NCQ. If you do have SATA drives, are they SATA-1 or SATA-2? Steve