From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Scobie Subject: Re: RAID 5 performance issue. Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 07:58:55 +1300 Message-ID: <4706896F.2060503@sauce.co.nz> References: <20071003105321.06943824@zeus.pccl.info> <20071003211910.439ded54@alpha.digital-domain.net> <72dbd3150710031336s331782c3yd0ac7ceda4e81774@mail.gmail.com> <20071004150831.6edbf926@zeus.pccl.info> <20071004154441.31addcfe@zeus.pccl.info> <20071004192653.25eb333b@alpha.digital-domain.net> <20071005115719.4a71ab89@zeus.pccl.info> <20071005135312.04856211@zeus.pccl.info> <20071005143023.2bce96e9@zeus.pccl.info> <20071005171 008.3e8a664d@zeus.pccl.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071005171008.3e8a664d@zeus.pccl.info> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Have you had a look at the smartctl -a outputs of all the drives? Possibly one drive is being slow to respond due to seek errors etc. but I would perhaps expect to be seeing this in the log. If you have a full backup and a spare drive, I would probably rotate it through the array. Regards, Richard