From: "Daniel L. Miller" <dmiller@amfes.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid-10 mount at startup always has problem
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:43:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47202D17.3040000@amfes.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471FA485.6010705@tmr.com>
Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>>> Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>> Current mdadm.conf:
>> DEVICE partitions
>> ARRAY /dev/.static/dev/md0 level=raid10 num-devices=4
>> UUID=9d94b17b:f5fac31a:577c252b:0d4c4b2a auto=part
>>
>> still have the problem where on boot one drive is not part of the
>> array. Is there a log file I can check to find out WHY a drive is
>> not being added? It's been a while since the reboot, but I did find
>> some entries in dmesg - I'm appending both the md lines and the
>> physical disk related lines. The bottom shows one disk not being
>> added (this time is was sda) - and the disk that gets skipped on each
>> boot seems to be random - there's no consistent failure:
>
> I suspect the base problem is that you are using whole disks instead
> of partitions, and the problem with the partition table below is
> probably an indication that you have something on that drive which
> looks like a partition table but isn't. That prevents the drive from
> being recognized as a whole drive. You're lucky, if the data looked
> enough like a partition table to be valid the o/s probably would have
> tried to do something with it.
> [...]
> This may be the rare case where you really do need to specify the
> actual devices to get reliable operation.
OK - I'm officially confused now (I was just unofficially before). WHY
is it a problem using whole drives as RAID components? I would have
thought that building a RAID storage unit with identically sized drives
- and using each drive's full capacity - is exactly the way you're
supposed to! I should mention that the boot/system drive is IDE, and
NOT part of the RAID. So I'm not worried about losing the system - but
I AM concerned about the data. I'm using four drives in a RAID-10
configuration - I thought this would provide a good blend of safety and
performance for a small fileserver.
Because it's RAID-10 - I would ASSuME that I can drop one drive (after
all, I keep booting one drive short), partition if necessary, and add it
back in. But how would splitting these disks into partitions improve
either stability or performance?
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-27 18:14 Raid-10 mount at startup always has problem Daniel L. Miller
[not found] ` <46D49F1A.7030409@tmr.com>
2007-09-10 1:53 ` Daniel L. Miller
2007-09-10 2:04 ` Richard Scobie
[not found] ` <46E4A5F0.9090407@sauce.co.nz>
2007-09-10 2:11 ` Daniel L. Miller
2007-10-24 14:22 ` Daniel L. Miller
2007-10-24 16:25 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-24 20:01 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-25 5:43 ` Daniel L. Miller [this message]
2007-10-25 6:40 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-26 9:15 ` Luca Berra
2007-10-26 16:53 ` Gabor Gombas
2007-10-27 7:57 ` Luca Berra
2007-10-26 19:26 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-27 7:50 ` Luca Berra
2007-10-27 15:07 ` Gabor Gombas
2007-10-27 20:47 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-28 13:37 ` Luca Berra
2007-10-28 17:55 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-29 0:21 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-29 7:41 ` Luca Berra
2007-10-29 13:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-29 15:21 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-29 15:54 ` Gabor Gombas
2007-10-29 14:31 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-29 5:59 ` Daniel L. Miller
2007-10-29 8:18 ` Luca Berra
2007-10-29 15:47 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-29 21:29 ` Luca Berra
2007-10-29 23:15 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-30 0:03 ` Daniel L. Miller
2007-11-01 13:56 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-17 14:58 ` Daniel L. Miller
2007-10-29 17:08 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-29 18:56 ` Richard Scobie
2007-10-25 6:12 ` Neil Brown
2007-10-25 6:51 ` Doug Ledford
2007-10-25 13:13 ` Daniel L. Miller
2007-10-25 13:33 ` Daniel L. Miller
2007-10-26 6:12 ` Neil Brown
2007-10-25 14:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-25 16:13 ` Daniel L. Miller
2007-10-26 5:59 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47202D17.3040000@amfes.com \
--to=dmiller@amfes.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).