From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: switching root fs '/' to boot from RAID1 with grub Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:44:45 -0700 Message-ID: <472D402D.6040900@zytor.com> References: <20071030210721.386ca2fa@absurd> <1193781699.10336.585.camel@firewall.xsintricity.com> <472A0D7A.4040807@zytor.com> <472B51F0.3080605@panix.com> <472D3A1C.800@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <472D3A1C.800@tmr.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bill Davidsen Cc: berk walker , Doug Ledford , Janek Kozicki , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Bill Davidsen wrote: >>> >> Depends how "bad" the drive is. Just to align the thread on this - >> If the boot sector is bad - the bios on newer boxes will skip to the >> next one. But if it is "good", and you boot into garbage - - could be >> Windows.. does it crash? > > Right, if the drive is dead almost every BIOS will fail over, if the > read gets a CRC or similar most recent BIOS will fail over, but if an > error-free read returns bad data, how can the BIOS know. > Unfortunately the Linux boot format doesn't contain any sort of integrity check. Otherwise the bootloader could catch this kind of error and throw a failure, letting the next disk boot (or another kernel.) -hpa