telling mdadm to use spare drive.

telling mdadm to use spare drive.

[Janek Kozicki]

Hi,

I finished copying all data from old disc hdc to my shiny new
RAID5 array (/dev/hda3 /dev/sda3 missing). Next step is to create a
partition on hdc and add it to the array. And so I did this:

# mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/hdc3

But then I had a problem - the /dev/hdc3 was a spare, it didn't
resync automatically:

# mdadm -D /dev/md1
[....]
    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       3        3        0      active sync   /dev/hda3
       1       8        3        1      active sync   /dev/sda3
       2       0        0        2      removed

       3      22        3        -      spare   /dev/hdc3


I wanted to tell mdadm to use the spare device, and I wasn't sure how
to do this, so I tried following:

# mdadm --stop /dev/md1
# mdadm --assemble --update=resync /dev/md1 /dev/hda3 /dev/sda3 /dev/hdc3

Now, 'mdadm -D /dev/md1' says:
[...]
    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       3        3        0      active sync   /dev/hda3
       1       8        3        1      active sync   /dev/sda3
       3      22        3        2      spare rebuilding   /dev/hdc3


I'm writing here just because I want to be sure that I added this new
device correctly, I don't want to make any stupid mistake here...

# cat /proc/mdstat

md1 : active raid5 hda3[0] hdc3[3] sda3[1]
      966807296 blocks super 1.1 level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/2] [UU_]
      [=>...................]  recovery =  6.2% (30068096/483403648) finish=254.9min speed=29639K/sec
      bitmap: 8/8 pages [32KB], 32768KB chunk

Was there a better way to do this, is it OK?

-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |

man mdadm - suggested correction.

[Janek Kozicki]

Hello, 

I did read 'man mdadm' from top to bottom, but I totally forgot to
look into /usr/share/doc/mdadm !

And there is much more - FAQs, recipes, etc!

Can you please add do the manual under 'SEE ALSO' a reference
to /usr/share/doc/mdadm ?

thanks :-)
-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |

Re: man mdadm - suggested correction.

[Michael Tokarev]

Janek Kozicki wrote:
[]
> Can you please add do the manual under 'SEE ALSO' a reference
> to /usr/share/doc/mdadm ?

/usr/share/doc/mdadm is Debian-specific (well.. not sure it's really
Debian (or something derived from it) -- some other distros may use
the same naming scheme, too).  Other distributions may place the
files into a different directory, or not ship them at all, or ship
them in alternative package.

In any case, say, on Debian a user always knows that other misc.
docs are in /usr/share/doc/$package - even if no other links are
provided in the manpage.  Users familiar with other distributions
knows where/how to find other docs there.

/mjt

man mdadm - suggested correction.

[Janek Kozicki]

Hello, 

I did read 'man mdadm' from top to bottom, but I totally forgot to
look into /usr/share/doc/mdadm !

And there is much more - FAQs, recipes, etc!

Can you please add to the manual under 'SEE ALSO' a reference
to /usr/share/doc/mdadm ?

thanks :-)
-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |

Re: man mdadm - suggested correction.

[Janek Kozicki]

Janek Kozicki said:     (by the date of Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:58:15 +0100)

> I did read 'man mdadm' from top to bottom, but I totally forgot to
> look into /usr/share/doc/mdadm !

PS: this why I asked so much questions on this list ;-)

-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |

Re: telling mdadm to use spare drive.

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@wp.pl> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I finished copying all data from old disc hdc to my shiny new
> RAID5 array (/dev/hda3 /dev/sda3 missing). Next step is to create a
> partition on hdc and add it to the array. And so I did this:
>
> # mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/hdc3
>
> But then I had a problem - the /dev/hdc3 was a spare, it didn't
> resync automatically:

Strange. That is exactly how I always do it and it always just worked.
mdadm should start syncing on any spare as soon as a disk fails or you
add the spare to a degraded array afaik. No special "start now"
interaction needed.

MfG
        Goswin

Re: telling mdadm to use spare drive.

[Janek Kozicki]

Goswin von Brederlow said:     (by the date of Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:17:51 +0100)

> Strange. That is exactly how I always do it and it always just worked.
> mdadm should start syncing on any spare as soon as a disk fails or you
> add the spare to a degraded array afaik. No special "start now"
> interaction needed.

Thanks for your confirmation. I cannot explain this behaviour - I
just started using mdadm. If anybody here wants, I can remove the
drive and add this again, to see if I can duplicate this "bug" (?).
If so - then tell me what debug information you do need and I will
give it to you.

Anyway, it seems that this command 

  mdadm --assemble --update=resync /dev/md1 /dev/hda3 /dev/sda3 /dev/hdc3

worked, becasue `mdadm -D /dev/md1` says that array is in
"State : active" (not degraded).

best regards
-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |

Re: telling mdadm to use spare drive.

[Richard Scobie]

Janek Kozicki wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow said:     (by the date of Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:17:51 +0100)
> 
> 
>>Strange. That is exactly how I always do it and it always just worked.
>>mdadm should start syncing on any spare as soon as a disk fails or you
>>add the spare to a degraded array afaik. No special "start now"
>>interaction needed.
> 
> 
> Thanks for your confirmation. I cannot explain this behaviour - I
> just started using mdadm. If anybody here wants, I can remove the
> drive and add this again, to see if I can duplicate this "bug" (?).
> If so - then tell me what debug information you do need and I will
> give it to you.

What kernel and RAID level is this?

If it's RAID 1, I seem to recall there was a relatively recently fixed 
bug for this.

Regards,

Richard

Re: telling mdadm to use spare drive.

[Janek Kozicki]

Richard Scobie said:     (by the date of Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:13:19 +1300)

> What kernel and RAID level is this?
> 
> If it's RAID 1, I seem to recall there was a relatively recently fixed 
> bug for this.

debian etch, stock install
Linux 2.6.18-5-k7 #1 SMP i686 GNU/Linux

The problem was with was RAID 5.

But also I have RAID 1 there, and after --add the drives
automatically resynced.

-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |

Re: telling mdadm to use spare drive.

[Richard Scobie]

Janek Kozicki wrote:
> Richard Scobie said:     (by the date of Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:13:19 +1300)
> 
> 
>>What kernel and RAID level is this?
>>
>>If it's RAID 1, I seem to recall there was a relatively recently fixed 
>>bug for this.
> 
> 
> debian etch, stock install
> Linux 2.6.18-5-k7 #1 SMP i686 GNU/Linux
> 
> The problem was with was RAID 5.
> 
> But also I have RAID 1 there, and after --add the drives
> automatically resynced.
> 

OK.

This was the bug I was thinking of:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=116003247912732&w=2

Regards,

Richard

Re: telling mdadm to use spare drive.

[Janek Kozicki]

Richard Scobie said:     (by the date of Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:32:08 +1300)

> This was the bug I was thinking of:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=116003247912732&w=2

This bug says that it only with mdadm 1.x:

   "If a drive is added to a raid1 using older tools
    (mdadm-1.x or raidtools) then it will be included
    in the array without any resync happening."

But I have here:

# mdadm --version
mdadm - v2.5.6 - 9 November 2006

maybe I stumbled on another bug?

-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |