* md RAID 10 on Linux 2.6.20?
@ 2007-11-23 3:09 thomas62186218
2007-11-23 3:27 ` Neil Brown
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: thomas62186218 @ 2007-11-23 3:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi all,
I am running a home-grown Linux 2.6.20.11 SMP 64-bit build, and I am
wondering if there is indeed a RAID 10 "personality" defined in md that
can be implemented using mdadm. If so, is it available in 2.6.20.11, or
is it in a later kernel version? In the past, to create RAID 10, I
created RAID 1's and a RAID 0, so an 8 drive RAID 10 would actually
consist of 5 md devices (four RAID 1's and one RAID 0). But if I could
just use RAID 10 natively, and simply create one RAID 10, that would of
course be better both in terms of management and probably performance I
would guess. Is this possible?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Thomas
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
http://mail.aol.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: md RAID 10 on Linux 2.6.20?
2007-11-23 3:09 md RAID 10 on Linux 2.6.20? thomas62186218
@ 2007-11-23 3:27 ` Neil Brown
2007-11-23 18:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-11-23 22:04 ` Peter Grandi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2007-11-23 3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas62186218; +Cc: linux-raid
On Thursday November 22, thomas62186218@aol.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am running a home-grown Linux 2.6.20.11 SMP 64-bit build, and I am
> wondering if there is indeed a RAID 10 "personality" defined in md that
> can be implemented using mdadm. If so, is it available in 2.6.20.11, or
> is it in a later kernel version? In the past, to create RAID 10, I
> created RAID 1's and a RAID 0, so an 8 drive RAID 10 would actually
> consist of 5 md devices (four RAID 1's and one RAID 0). But if I could
> just use RAID 10 natively, and simply create one RAID 10, that would of
> course be better both in terms of management and probably performance I
> would guess. Is this possible?
Why don't you try it and see, or check the documentation?
But yes, there is native RAID10 in 2.6.20.
NeilBrown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: md RAID 10 on Linux 2.6.20?
2007-11-23 3:09 md RAID 10 on Linux 2.6.20? thomas62186218
2007-11-23 3:27 ` Neil Brown
@ 2007-11-23 18:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-11-23 22:04 ` Peter Grandi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2007-11-23 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas62186218; +Cc: linux-raid
thomas62186218@aol.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am running a home-grown Linux 2.6.20.11 SMP 64-bit build, and I am
> wondering if there is indeed a RAID 10 "personality" defined in md
> that can be implemented using mdadm. If so, is it available in
> 2.6.20.11, or is it in a later kernel version? In the past, to create
> RAID 10, I created RAID 1's and a RAID 0, so an 8 drive RAID 10 would
> actually consist of 5 md devices (four RAID 1's and one RAID 0). But
> if I could just use RAID 10 natively, and simply create one RAID 10,
> that would of course be better both in terms of management and
> probably performance I would guess. Is this possible?
Yes, and you are correct on the performance. Read the man page section
on "near" and "far" copies of data carefully, and some back posts to
this list. Most of us find that using far copies generates slightly
slower write performance and significantly better read performance.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: md RAID 10 on Linux 2.6.20?
2007-11-23 3:09 md RAID 10 on Linux 2.6.20? thomas62186218
2007-11-23 3:27 ` Neil Brown
2007-11-23 18:18 ` Bill Davidsen
@ 2007-11-23 22:04 ` Peter Grandi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Grandi @ 2007-11-23 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux RAID
>>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:09:27 -0500, thomas62186218@aol.com
>>> said:
> [ ... ] a RAID 10 "personality" defined in md that can be
> implemented using mdadm. If so, is it available in 2.6.20.11,
> [ ... ]
Very good choice about 'raid10' in general. For a single layer
just use '-l raid10'. Run 'man mdadm', the '-l' option and also
the '-p' option for the more exotic variants. Also 'man 4 md'
the "RAID10" section.
The pairs are formed naturally out of the block device list
(first with second listed, and so on).
> 8 drive RAID 10 would actually consist of 5 md devices (four
> RAID 1's and one RAID 0). [ ... ] one RAID 10, that would of
> course be better both in terms of management and probably
> performance I would guess. [ ... ]
Indeed easier in terms of management and there are some
interesting options for layout. Not sure about performance, as
sometimes I have seen strange interactions with the page cache
either way, but usually '-l raid10' is the way to go as you say.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-23 22:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-23 3:09 md RAID 10 on Linux 2.6.20? thomas62186218
2007-11-23 3:27 ` Neil Brown
2007-11-23 18:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-11-23 22:04 ` Peter Grandi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).