From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de>
Subject: Re: raid6 check/repair
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:25:43 +0100
Message-ID: <4762A077.90600@ph.tum.de>
References: <47443697.7060108@ph.tum.de>
Reply-To: thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <47443697.7060108@ph.tum.de>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: neilb@suse.de
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Dear Neil,

this thread has died out, but I'd prefer not to let it end without any 
kind of result being reached.  Therefore, I'm kindly asking you to draw 
a conclusion from the arguments being exchanged:

Concerning the implementation of a 'repair' that can actually recover 
data in some cases instead of just recalculating parity:

Do you

a) oppose the case (patches not accepted)
b) don't care (but potentially accept patches)
c) support it

Thank you very much and kind regards,

Thiemo Nagel