From: Brendan Conoboy <blc@redhat.com>
To: Norman Elton <normelton@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid over 48 disks
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:36:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47682F33.7040701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00EF99B2-3BCC-4D75-BC75-8F256B0A2476@gmail.com>
Norman Elton wrote:
> We're investigating the possibility of running Linux (RHEL) on top of
> Sun's X4500 Thumper box:
>
> http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4500/
Neat- 6 8 port SATA controllers! It'll be worth checking to be sure
each controller has equal bandwidth. If some controllers are on slower
buses than others you may want to consider that and balance the md
device layout.
> So... we're curious how Linux will handle such a beast. Has anyone run
> MD software RAID over so many disks? Then piled LVM/ext3 on top of that?
> Any suggestions?
There used to be a maximum number of devices allowed in a single md
device. Not sure if that is still the case.
With this many drives you would be well advised to make smaller raid
devices then combine them into a larger md device (or via lvm, etc).
Consider a write with a 48 device raid5- the system may need to read
blocks from all those drives before a single write!
If it were my system, all ports were equally well connected, I'd create
3 16 drive RAID5's with 1 hot spare, then combine them via raid 0 or
lvm. That's just my usage scenario, though (modest reliability,
excellent read speed, modest write speed).
If you put ext3 on time, remember to use the stride option when making
the filesystem.
> Are we crazy to think this is even possible?
Crazy, possible, and fun!
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-18 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-18 17:29 Raid over 48 disks Norman Elton
2007-12-18 18:27 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 19:34 ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-18 19:52 ` Norman Elton
2007-12-18 20:19 ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-18 20:25 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 21:13 ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-18 21:20 ` Jon Nelson
2007-12-18 21:40 ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-18 21:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 21:21 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-19 15:21 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-19 15:02 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-20 16:48 ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-21 1:53 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-18 18:45 ` Robin Hill
2007-12-18 20:28 ` Neil Brown
2007-12-19 8:27 ` Mattias Wadenstein
2007-12-19 15:26 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-21 11:03 ` Leif Nixon
2007-12-25 17:31 ` pg_mh, Peter Grandi
2007-12-25 21:08 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-18 20:36 ` Brendan Conoboy [this message]
2007-12-18 23:50 ` Guy Watkins
2007-12-18 23:58 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 23:59 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-19 12:08 ` Russell Smith
2007-12-21 10:57 ` Leif Nixon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47682F33.7040701@redhat.com \
--to=blc@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=normelton@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).