From: Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Norman Elton <normelton@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid over 48 disks
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:13:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <476837F6.7050404@ph.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712181523250.7823@p34.internal.lan>
>> Performance of the raw device is fair:
>> # dd if=/dev/md2 of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
>> 8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 15.6071 seconds, 550 MB/s
>>
>> Somewhat less through ext3 (created with -E stride=64):
>> # dd if=largetestfile of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
>> 8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 26.4103 seconds, 325 MB/s
>
> Quite slow?
>
> 10 disks (raptors) raid 5 on regular sata controllers:
>
> # dd if=/dev/md3 of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
> 8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 10.718 seconds, 801 MB/s
>
> # dd if=bigfile of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
> 3640379392 bytes (3.6 GB) copied, 6.58454 seconds, 553 MB/s
Interesting. Any ideas what could be the reason? How much do you get
from a single drive? -- The Samsung HD501LJ that I'm using gives
~84MB/s when reading from the beginning of the disk.
With RAID 5 I'm getting slightly better results (though I really wonder
why, since naively I would expect identical read performance) but that
does only account for a small part of the difference:
16k read 64k write
chunk
size RAID 5 RAID 6 RAID 5 RAID 6
128k 492 497 268 270
256k 615 530 288 270
512k 625 607 230 174
1024k 650 620 170 75
Kind regards,
Thiemo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-18 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-18 17:29 Raid over 48 disks Norman Elton
2007-12-18 18:27 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 19:34 ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-18 19:52 ` Norman Elton
2007-12-18 20:19 ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-18 20:25 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 21:13 ` Thiemo Nagel [this message]
2007-12-18 21:20 ` Jon Nelson
2007-12-18 21:40 ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-18 21:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 21:21 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-19 15:21 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-19 15:02 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-20 16:48 ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-21 1:53 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-18 18:45 ` Robin Hill
2007-12-18 20:28 ` Neil Brown
2007-12-19 8:27 ` Mattias Wadenstein
2007-12-19 15:26 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-21 11:03 ` Leif Nixon
2007-12-25 17:31 ` pg_mh, Peter Grandi
2007-12-25 21:08 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-18 20:36 ` Brendan Conoboy
2007-12-18 23:50 ` Guy Watkins
2007-12-18 23:58 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 23:59 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-19 12:08 ` Russell Smith
2007-12-21 10:57 ` Leif Nixon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=476837F6.7050404@ph.tum.de \
--to=thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=normelton@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).