linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Norman Elton <normelton@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid over 48 disks
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:13:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <476837F6.7050404@ph.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712181523250.7823@p34.internal.lan>

>> Performance of the raw device is fair:
>> # dd if=/dev/md2 of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
>> 8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 15.6071 seconds, 550 MB/s
>>
>> Somewhat less through ext3 (created with -E stride=64):
>> # dd if=largetestfile of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
>> 8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 26.4103 seconds, 325 MB/s
> 
> Quite slow?
> 
> 10 disks (raptors) raid 5 on regular sata controllers:
> 
> # dd if=/dev/md3 of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
> 8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 10.718 seconds, 801 MB/s
> 
> # dd if=bigfile of=/dev/zero bs=128k count=64k
> 3640379392 bytes (3.6 GB) copied, 6.58454 seconds, 553 MB/s

Interesting.  Any ideas what could be the reason?  How much do you get 
from a single drive?  -- The Samsung HD501LJ that I'm using gives 
~84MB/s when reading from the beginning of the disk.

With RAID 5 I'm getting slightly better results (though I really wonder 
why, since naively I would expect identical read performance) but that 
does only account for a small part of the difference:

	16k read	64k write
chunk
size	RAID 5	RAID 6	RAID 5	RAID 6
128k	492	497	268	270
256k	615	530	288	270
512k	625	607	230	174
1024k	650	620	170	75

Kind regards,

Thiemo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-18 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-18 17:29 Raid over 48 disks Norman Elton
2007-12-18 18:27 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 19:34   ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-18 19:52     ` Norman Elton
2007-12-18 20:19       ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-18 20:25     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 21:13       ` Thiemo Nagel [this message]
2007-12-18 21:20         ` Jon Nelson
2007-12-18 21:40           ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-18 21:43           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 21:21         ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-19 15:21         ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-19 15:02           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-20 16:48           ` Thiemo Nagel
2007-12-21  1:53             ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-18 18:45 ` Robin Hill
2007-12-18 20:28 ` Neil Brown
2007-12-19  8:27   ` Mattias Wadenstein
2007-12-19 15:26     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-21 11:03     ` Leif Nixon
2007-12-25 17:31   ` pg_mh, Peter Grandi
2007-12-25 21:08     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-18 20:36 ` Brendan Conoboy
2007-12-18 23:50   ` Guy Watkins
2007-12-18 23:58     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-18 23:59       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-19 12:08     ` Russell Smith
2007-12-21 10:57 ` Leif Nixon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=476837F6.7050404@ph.tum.de \
    --to=thiemo.nagel@ph.tum.de \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=normelton@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).