From: James Paradis <jparadis@redhat.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Fix resync hang after surprise removal
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:42:19 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4770908.772445.1308325339109.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110616113656.190fef9f@notabene.brown>
> NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for the report and the patch.
>
> However I don't think the patch really does what you want.
>
> The two tests are already mutually exclusive as one begins with
> raid_disk >= 0
> and the other with
> raid_disk < 0
> and neither change raid_disk.
>
> The reason the patch has an effect is the 'break' that has been added.
> i.e. as soon as you find a normal working device you break out of the
> loop
> and stop looking for spares.
>
> I think the correct fix is simply:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 4332fc2..91e31e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -7088,6 +7088,7 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(mddev_t *mddev)
> list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) {
> if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
> !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
> + !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags) &&
> !test_bit(Blocked, &rdev->flags))
> spares++;
> if (rdev->raid_disk < 0
>
>
> i.e. never consider a Faulty device to be a spare.
>
> It looks like this bug was introduced by commit dfc70645000616777
> in 2.6.26 when we allowed partially recovered devices to remain in the
> array
> when a different device fails.
>
> Can you please conform that this patch removes your symptom?
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
This patch does indeed fix the problem! Thanks!
--jim
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 16:02 [PATCH/RFC] Fix resync hang after surprise removal Jim Paradis
2011-06-16 1:36 ` NeilBrown
2011-06-17 15:42 ` James Paradis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4770908.772445.1308325339109.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com \
--to=jparadis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).