linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Moshe Yudkowsky <moshe@pobox.com>
To: Carlos Carvalho <carlos@fisica.ufpr.br>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: One Large md or Many Smaller md for Better Peformance?
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:34:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4795D4B6.4070908@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18325.21933.337369.104689@fisica.ufpr.br>

Carlos Carvalho wrote:

> I use reiser3 and xfs. reiser3 is very good with many small files. A
> simple test shows interactively perceptible results: removing large
> files is faster with xfs, removing large directories (ex. the kernel
> tree) is faster with reiser3.

My current main concern about XFS and reiser3 is writebacks. The default 
mode for ext3 is "journal," which in case of power failure is more 
robust than the writeback modes of XFS, reiser3, or JFS -- or so I'm 
given to understand.

On the other hand, I have a UPS and it should shut down gracefully 
regardless if there's a power failure. I wonder if I'm being too cautious?


-- 
Moshe Yudkowsky * moshe@pobox.com * www.pobox.com/~moshe
  "Keep some secrets/Never tell,
   And they will keep you very well."
    					-- Michelle Shocked

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-22 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-20 20:24 One Large md or Many Smaller md for Better Peformance? Moshe Yudkowsky
2008-01-20 21:57 ` Iustin Pop
2008-01-21  3:19   ` Moshe Yudkowsky
2008-01-22  2:32     ` Carlos Carvalho
2008-01-22 11:34       ` Moshe Yudkowsky [this message]
2008-01-22 15:17         ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-01-22 15:30         ` Bill Davidsen
2008-01-22 15:32         ` Iustin Pop
2008-01-20 22:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-01-21  3:17   ` One Large md or Many Smaller md for Better Performance? Moshe Yudkowsky
2008-01-21 10:41   ` One Large md or Many Smaller md for Better Peformance? Ask Bjørn Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4795D4B6.4070908@pobox.com \
    --to=moshe@pobox.com \
    --cc=carlos@fisica.ufpr.br \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).