From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tokarev Subject: Re: WRONG INFO (was Re: In this partition scheme, grub does not find md information?) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:39:10 +0300 Message-ID: <47A07DFE.6090606@msgid.tls.msk.ru> References: <479EAF42.6010604@pobox.com> <18334.46306.611615.493031@notabene.brown> <479F07E1.7060408@pobox.com> <479F0AAB.3090702@rabbit.us> <479F331F.7080902@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <479F3C74.1050605@rabbit.us> <479F4CFC.5060305@pobox.com> <47A05971.1020507@dgreaves.com> <47A06331.5050709@pobox.com> <47A066C0.7040602@rabbit.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47A066C0.7040602@rabbit.us> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Rabbitson Cc: Moshe Yudkowsky , David Greaves , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Peter Rabbitson wrote: > Moshe Yudkowsky wrote: >> over the other. For example, I've now learned that if I want to set up >> a RAID1 /boot, it must actually be 1.2 or grub won't be able to read >> it. (I would therefore argue that if the new version ever becomes >> default, then the default sub-version ought to be 1.2.) > > In the discussion yesterday I myself made a serious typo, that should > not spread. The only superblock version that will work with current GRUB > is 1.0 _not_ 1.2. Ghrrm. 1.0, or 0.9. 0.9 is still the default with mdadm. /mjt