From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use new sb type Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:28:52 -0500 Message-ID: <47B093E4.1050903@tmr.com> References: <479E1C95.1040008@dgreaves.com> <479FB1FB.6040500@tmr.com> <47AED31A.3070704@dgreaves.com> <47AEEDAD.5050405@dgreaves.com> <47B00577.30402@dgreaves.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47B00577.30402@dgreaves.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Greaves Cc: Jan Engelhardt , neilb@suse.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids David Greaves wrote: > Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >>> Feel free to argue that the manpage is clear on this - but as we know, not >>> everyone reads the manpages in depth... >>> >> That is indeed suboptimal (but I would not care since I know the >> implications of an SB at the front) >> > > Neil cares even less and probably doesn't even need mdadm - heck he probably > just echos the raw superblock into place via dd... > > http://xkcd.com/378/ > I don't know why this makes me think of APL... -- Bill Davidsen "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark