From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Rabbitson Subject: Re: How many drives are bad? Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:45:20 +0100 Message-ID: <47BDF0F0.3010604@rabbit.us> References: <6b3a7f010802190923v6b600fedy2a68ad6797449c6e@mail.gmail.com> <21289113-077C-4082-8EE1-C7AA11D4FE69@gmail.com> <6b3a7f010802191038y377999e0v46dcd7132ab3bc97@mail.gmail.com> <6b3a7f010802191125q3905d1abw2372ed5c7ab1eaf0@mail.gmail.com> <18363.54503.132788.594068@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> <9348A68C-6747-481A-96C0-13691F7863EF@gmail.com> <18365.58624.781868.314351@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <18365.58624.781868.314351@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Grandi Cc: Linux RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids Peter Grandi wrote: > In general, I'd use RAID10 (http://WWW.BAARF.com/), RAID5 in Interesting movement. What do you think is their stance on Raid Fix? :)