From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9yIEFybmUgVmVzdGLDuA==?= Subject: Re: RAID5 in sync does not populate slots sequentially, shows array as (somewhat) faulty Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:44:20 +0100 Message-ID: <47CBE494.3060406@gmail.com> References: <47CBD62E.7040608@rabbit.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47CBD62E.7040608@rabbit.us> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Peter Rabbitson wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Noticing the problems Tor Vestb=F8 is having, I remembered that I hav= e an=20 > array in a similar state, which I never figured out.=20 [snip] > Array Slot : 4 (failed, 1, 2, 3, 0) > Array State : Uuuu 1 failed <-- why is that? > root@Thesaurus:~# I've seen this in my array too. Was expecting Uuu_, or Uuuu after=20 rebuild, but it also said "1 failed". Tor Arne -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html