From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Michael Guntsche <mike@it-loops.com>
Cc: Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange RAID-5 rebuild problem
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:53:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CC3B06.7050708@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A5F6B52A-00BB-4096-9A8D-367F61989186@it-loops.com>
Michael Guntsche wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2008, at 23:41, Michael Guntsche wrote:
>>
>> mdadm -w /dev/md1 works if I call it after assembling.
>> If do not call it, mount the array and start writing to it, it
>> changes to "active"
>> but the rebuild process does not kick in.
>>
>> The only way it works for me now is.
>> * Stop the array
>> * assemble it again with mdadm --assemble --scan
>> * Call mdadm -w /dev/md1
>
> Good morning,
>
> I found out why I am seeing this behaviour but I still do not know if
> it is a bug or not.
>
> The arrays are assembled in an initramfs. Debian's mdadm tool has a
> script that assembles the arrays.
>
> Now this script has the following entry.
>
> # prevent writes/syncs so that resuming works (#415441). See
> http:/bugs.debian.org/415441 for more information.
> echo 1 > /sys/module/md_mod/parameters/start_ro
>
> Changing this sysfs entry to 0, gives me the expected result if I do a
> stop -> assemble with my 1.0 array.
> It starts reysncing and everything is ok. According to the replies in
> this bug, setting start_ro to 1 should NOT stop the automatic resync
> after a write to it, but this seems to have changed now.
> So, is this a change in behaviour or is it a bug. If it is the former,
> I probably need to talk with the debian guys about it, if it is a bug
> I wait for a fix and comment the entry in the mean time.
Note that if you don't start_ro I don't believe you will be able to use
the resume feature. The use of -w option would seem safer. I haven't
looked at the patch Neil submitted to start rebuild/reshape at the first
write, the logic seems correct to work with resume, nothing should start
until a user write.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-03 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-01 21:09 Strange RAID-5 rebuild problem Michael Guntsche
2008-03-01 22:02 ` Michael Guntsche
[not found] ` <20080301222326.GA20435@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk>
2008-03-01 22:41 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02 7:38 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02 8:14 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02 10:09 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-03-02 10:20 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-03 0:33 ` Neil Brown
2008-03-03 12:38 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-02 12:29 ` Robin Hill
2008-03-02 20:55 ` Michael Guntsche
2008-03-03 17:53 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47CC3B06.7050708@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike@it-loops.com \
--cc=robin@robinhill.me.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).