linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Myers <mikesm559@yahoo.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, john lists <john4lists@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Need urgent help in fixing raid5 array
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:19:40 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <480194.8807.qm@web30808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: alpine.DEB.1.10.0901021355370.3485@p34.internal.lan

Ok, good news and bad news.  I finally got all the disks connected and bypassed the backplane.  Md2 starts with 6 members in a degraded mode.  Md1 is still having the same problem.  In doing an examine on each member disk, I discovered that 8 disks had the superblock referencing md2's UUID.  The other thing is that only 6 had the UUID of md1, which is suppposed to have 7 members.  One of the two (sdf1) that has the superblock of md2 (but not active in the array) is also an Hitachi, which it shouldn't be (md2 is a seagate 7200.11 array). This appears to be the missing md1 disk.  I don't understand how it got the other raid array's info, but things are weird here.

That was the good news.  The bad news is that when I tried to assemble md1 with all the md1 members plus sdf1 (the disk that thinks its part of md2), I mistakenly used it as the target for for mdadm assemble command.  Ugh.

So I typed: mdadm /dev/sdf1 --assemble /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdi1 /dev/sdj1 --force

So now sdf1 instead of having the wrong superblock has no super block.  Am I completely hosed at this point?  I probably needed to figure out a way to get this disk a new superblock anyway, but but I suspect things are even harder to fix at this point.

Any ideas as to how to fix this?  Is there another superblock somewhere else on the disk that I can recover the proper info from?

Thanks,
mike




----- Original Message ----
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: Mike Myers <mikesm559@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; john lists <john4lists@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 10:57:13 AM
Subject: Re: Need urgent help in fixing raid5 array



On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Mike Myers wrote:

> Well, I can read from sdg1 just fine.  It seems to work ok, at least for a few GB of data.   I'll try this on some of the other disks, but it is possible for to pull the disks out of the backplane and run the SFF-8087 fanout cables direct to each drive and bypass the backplane completely.  It certainly would be easy to do this for the at least the sdo1 drive and see if I can get better results going direct to the disk.  I have moved the disks around the backplane a bit to deal with the issues of the controller failure, so I am pretty sure it's not just one bad slot or the like.
> 
> So you've seen a backplane fail in away that the disks come up fine at boot but have corrupted data transfers across them?  I wonder about the sata cables in that case as well.  I could hook up a pair of PMP's to my SI3132's and bypass the 8077 cables as well.

1. Try by-passing the backplane.
2. Bad cables will usually cause smart identifier UDMA_CRC_Error_Count to
   increase quite high, if it is 0 or close to it, the cable is unlikely the
   issue.
3. I have seem all kinds of weirdness with bad backplanes, drives dropping out
   of the array, drives producing I/O errors, etc.

Justin.


      

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-03  4:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <451872.61166.qm@web30802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
2009-01-01 15:40 ` Need urgent help in fixing raid5 array Justin Piszcz
2009-01-01 17:51   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-01 18:29     ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-01 18:40       ` Jon Nelson
2009-01-01 20:38         ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02  6:19       ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02 12:10         ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-02 18:12           ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02 18:22             ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-02 18:46               ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02 18:57                 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-02 20:46                   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02 20:56                   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-02 21:37                   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-03  4:19                   ` Mike Myers [this message]
2009-01-03  4:43                     ` Guy Watkins
2009-01-03  5:02                       ` Mike Myers
2009-01-03 12:46                         ` John Robinson
2009-01-03 15:49                           ` Mike Myers
2009-01-03 16:14                             ` John Robinson
2009-01-03 16:47                               ` Mike Myers
2009-01-03 19:03                               ` Mike Myers
2009-01-05 22:11         ` Neil Brown
2009-01-05 22:22           ` Mike Myers
2009-01-05 22:53             ` NeilBrown
2009-01-06  2:46               ` Mike Myers
2009-01-06  4:00                 ` NeilBrown
2009-01-06  5:55                   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-06 23:23                     ` Neil Brown
2009-01-06  6:24                   ` Mike Myers
2009-01-06 23:31                     ` Neil Brown
2009-01-06 23:54                       ` Mike Myers
2009-01-07  0:19                         ` NeilBrown
2009-01-13  5:38                       ` Mike Myers
2009-01-13  5:57                         ` Mike Myers
2009-01-01 15:31 Mike Myers
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-05 17:03 Mike Myers
2008-12-06  0:18 ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06  0:24   ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-06  0:47     ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06  0:51       ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-06  0:58         ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06 19:02         ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06 19:30           ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06 20:14             ` Mike Myers
2008-12-06  0:52     ` David Lethe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=480194.8807.qm@web30808.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
    --to=mikesm559@yahoo.com \
    --cc=john4lists@gmail.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).