From: Bas van Schaik <bas@tuxes.nl>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mismatch_cnt questions
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 13:16:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482826F0.2070405@tuxes.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17898.45673.573800.56474@notabene.brown>
Neil Brown wrote:
> On Sunday March 4, pernegger@gmail.com wrote:
>
> (...)
>> 3) Is the "repair" sync action safe to use on the above kernel? Any
>> other methods / additional steps for fixing this?
>>
>
> "repair" is safe, though it may not be effective.
> "repair" for raid1 was did not work until Jan 26th this year.
> Before then it was identical in effect to 'check'.
>
Sorry to dig up such an old thread, but I'd like to know since when
(which kernel version) "repair" (recompute parity, assuming data is
consistent) for raid5 is effective?
-- Bas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-12 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-04 11:22 mismatch_cnt questions Christian Pernegger
2007-03-04 11:50 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-04 12:01 ` Christian Pernegger
2007-03-04 22:19 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-06 10:04 ` mismatch_cnt questions - how about raid10? Peter Rabbitson
2007-03-06 10:20 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-06 10:56 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-03-06 10:59 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-03-12 5:35 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-12 14:26 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-03-04 21:21 ` mismatch_cnt questions Eyal Lebedinsky
2007-03-04 22:30 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-05 7:45 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2007-03-05 14:56 ` detecting/correcting _slightly_ flaky disks Michael Stumpf
2007-03-05 15:09 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-03-05 17:01 ` Michael Stumpf
2007-03-05 17:11 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-03-07 0:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-07 1:37 ` Michael Stumpf
2007-03-07 13:57 ` berk walker
2007-03-07 15:01 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-05 23:40 ` mismatch_cnt questions Neil Brown
2007-03-07 0:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-08 6:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-08 13:54 ` Martin K. Petersen
2007-03-09 2:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-09 4:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-09 5:20 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-08 6:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-08 7:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-08 8:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-13 9:58 ` Andre Noll
2007-03-13 23:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-06 6:27 ` Paul Davidson
2008-05-12 11:16 ` Bas van Schaik [this message]
2008-05-12 14:31 ` Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482826F0.2070405@tuxes.nl \
--to=bas@tuxes.nl \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).