From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
LinuxRaid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression- XFS won't mount on partitioned md array
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:59:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482DD981.5070004@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482DC043.5000307@dgreaves.com>
David Greaves wrote:
> I just attempted a kernel upgrade from 2.6.20.7 to 2.6.25.3 and it no longer
> mounts my xfs filesystem.
>
> I bisected it to around
> a67d7c5f5d25d0b13a4dfb182697135b014fa478
> [XFS] Move platform specific mount option parse out of core XFS code
around that... not exactly? That commit should have been largely a code
move, which is not to say that it can't contain a bug... :)
> I have a RAID5 array with partitions:
>
> Partition Table for /dev/md_d0
>
> First Last
> # Type Sector Sector Offset Length Filesystem Type (ID) Flag
> -- ------- ----------- ----------- ------ ----------- -------------------- ----
> 1 Primary 0 2500288279 4 2500288280 Linux (83) None
> 2 Primary 2500288280 2500483583 0 195304 Non-FS data (DA) None
>
>
> when I attempt to mount /media:
> /dev/md_d0p1 /media xfs rw,nobarrier,noatime,logdev=/dev/md_d0p2,allocsize=512m 0 0
mythbox? :)
Hm, so it's the external log size that it doesn't much like...
> I get:
> md_d0: p1 p2
> XFS mounting filesystem md_d0p1
> attempt to access beyond end of device
> md_d0p2: rw=0, want=195311, limit=195304
what does /proc/partitions say about md_d0p1 and p2? Is it different
between the older & newer kernel?
What does xfs_info /mount/point say about the filesystem when you mount
it under the older kernel? Or... if you can't mount it,
xfs_db -r -c "sb 0" -c p /dev/md_d0p1
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-16 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-16 17:11 Regression- XFS won't mount on partitioned md array David Greaves
2008-05-16 17:16 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-16 18:05 ` David Greaves
2008-05-16 18:35 ` Oliver Pinter
2008-05-17 14:48 ` David Greaves
2008-05-17 15:20 ` David Greaves
2008-05-16 18:59 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-05-17 14:46 ` David Greaves
2008-05-17 15:15 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-17 19:10 ` Mechanism to safely force repair of single md stripe w/o hurting data integrity of file system David Lethe
2008-05-17 19:29 ` Peter Rabbitson
2008-05-17 20:26 ` Guy Watkins
2008-05-26 11:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-19 2:54 ` Neil Brown
2008-05-17 23:18 ` Regression- XFS won't mount on partitioned md array Eric Sandeen
[not found] ` <482FBD4C.20608@sandeen.net>
2008-05-18 8:48 ` David Greaves
2008-05-18 15:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-24 13:33 ` RFI for 2.6.25.5 : " David Greaves
2008-05-24 13:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-24 15:39 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482DD981.5070004@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).