linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Marvell 88SX7042 [4 Port SATA PCI-Express x4] Support/Questions
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 13:47:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4839A63E.4050409@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0805250757550.18572@p34.internal.lan>

Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Jeff has been working on this chipset/patching/etc:
..

Actually, I'm the one working on that chipset etc..  :)

> Looks like there are a couple cards sporting this new chip at the moment
..

There are lots of them out there, including Sonnet, Highpoint, and others.

> If one bought enough of these, one could possibly achieve speeds in 
> excess(!) of 1 gigabyte/second with enough drives and SW RAID in Linux.
> Does anyone have such a card? I would be interested if it could sustain 
> the maximum rate from each disk without any contention.
..

Sure, if the bus and memory are fast enough.  You'll hit the Linux/libata
transactions/sec limit at some point, but I don't know what that is.

Eg. Here's a 4X (I think) card in my PCIe video slot:

beefy:~# mdadm --create /dev/md0 --chunk=256 -l 0 --raid-devices=4 /dev/sd[bcde]
mdadm: array /dev/md0 started.

beefy:~# hdparm -t --direct /dev/sd[bcde] /dev/md0

/dev/sdb:
 Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:  218 MB in  3.01 seconds =  72.46 MB/sec

/dev/sdc:
 Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:  256 MB in  3.01 seconds =  85.00 MB/sec

/dev/sdd:
 Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:  192 MB in  3.01 seconds =  63.79 MB/sec

/dev/sde:
 Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:  256 MB in  3.01 seconds =  85.07 MB/sec

/dev/md0:
 Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:  768 MB in  3.00 seconds = 255.69 MB/sec

Similar results happen without the "--direct" flag as well.

> 2. How 'experimental' is it? 

The 7042 chipset is working rather well right now.
Older Marvell chips should still be considered "experimental"
for the time being.

Cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-25 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-25 12:03 Marvell 88SX7042 [4 Port SATA PCI-Express x4] Support/Questions Justin Piszcz
2008-05-25 17:47 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2008-05-25 19:43   ` Andre Tomt
2008-05-27  0:34   ` Grant Grundler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4839A63E.4050409@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).