linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: thomas62186218@aol.com
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software RAID 6 initial sync very slow
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:47:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48459FE8.6080604@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8CA92FCA38FE330-1A8-162F@webmail-nb02.sysops.aol.com>

thomas62186218@aol.com wrote:
> Thank you Bill and Richard for your responses.
>
> In sync_speed_max, I had already set it to 250000 (250MB/sec). For 
> sync_speed_min, I have 249900 set. My rational behind doing this was 
> to "force" it to go as fast as it can. Any problem with this?
>
Other than possibly totally killing your response if you use some other 
raid levels, no. I usually set the min speed to something I can tolerate 
in the background, and still have a useful system.

> However, adjusting stripe_cache_size did improve performance. It was 
> 256 at first, and my sync rate was 28MB/sec. When I increased it to 
> 4096, my sync rate jumped to 38MB/sec. Then I increased it to 16384, 
> and it jumped again to 40MB/sec. Increasing stripe_cache_size above 
> that did not seem to have any effect.
>
You definitely hit diminishing returns on cache_size. There are people 
on this list who swear by 32k or 64k, but even when I can spare the 
memory I don't see any benefit to looking for that last tiny gain.

> My question then is, how do I set the stripe_cache_size at the time of 
> md creation? I would rather set it then, as opposed to having to echo 
> stripe_cache_size variable with a new setting. In other words, where 
> is this default value of 256 coming from? Thanks all!!

rc.local is my usual choice for things like that, and if you want to 
really spend a lot of time chasing performance, be aware that you can 
use blockdev to play with readahead on the devince and filesystem, and 
generally spend days trying to create a test which will show benefits in 
a statistically valid manner. Add chunk size and knock yourself out. I 
am convinced that the answer to better performance is "it depends," so 
just boosting readahead and cache_size a bit usually gets 80-90% of 
anything you can get with tons of playing.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
  be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark 



      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-03 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-01 11:26 Software RAID 6 initial sync very slow thomas62186218
2008-06-01 20:37 ` Richard Scobie
2008-06-02 12:35 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-06-02 19:18   ` thomas62186218
2008-06-03  1:08     ` Richard Scobie
2008-06-03  5:11     ` Neil Brown
2008-06-03 19:47     ` Bill Davidsen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48459FE8.6080604@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas62186218@aol.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).