linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hubert Verstraete <hubskml@free.fr>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RAID5 losing initial synchronization on restart when one disk is spare
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:13:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48466AD9.5@free.fr> (raw)

Hello

According to mdadm's man page:
"When creating a RAID5 array, mdadm will automatically create a degraded
array with an extra spare drive. This is because building the spare
into a degraded array is in general faster than resyncing the parity on
a non-degraded, but not clean, array. This feature can be over-ridden
with the --force option."

Unfortunately, I'm seeing a kind of bug when I create a RAID5 array with 
an internal bitmap, then stop the array before the initial 
synchronization is done and restart the array.

1° When I create the array with an internal bitmap:
mdadm -C /dev/md_d1 -e 1.2 -l 5 -n 4 -b internal -R /dev/sd?
I see the last disk as a spare disk. After the restart of the array, all 
disks are seen active and the array is not continuing the aborted 
synchronization!
Note that I did not use the --assume-clean option.

2° When I create the array without a bitmap:
mdadm -C /dev/md_d1 -e 1.2 -l 5 -n 4 -R /dev/sd?
I see the last disk as a spare disk. After the restart of the array, the 
spare disk is still a spare disk and the array continues the 
synchronization where it had stopped.

In the case 1°, is this a bug or did I miss something?
Secondly, what could be the consequences of this non-performed 
synchronization ?

Kernel version: 2.6.26-rc4
mdadm version: 2.6.2

Thanks,
Hubert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2008-06-04 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-04 10:13 Hubert Verstraete [this message]
2008-06-10 11:57 ` RAID5 losing initial synchronization on restart when one disk is spare Hubert Verstraete
2008-06-10 22:56   ` Dan Williams
2008-06-11  9:27     ` Hubert Verstraete
2008-06-11 23:40     ` Neil Brown
2008-06-11 14:44   ` Hubert Verstraete
2008-06-11 23:38     ` Neil Brown
2008-06-12 13:05       ` Hubert Verstraete
2008-06-12 16:59         ` Dan Williams
2008-06-12 18:11           ` Hubert Verstraete
2008-06-11 23:45 ` Neil Brown
2008-06-12  8:03   ` David Greaves
2008-06-12 17:01     ` Dan Williams
2008-06-12  9:12   ` Hubert Verstraete

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48466AD9.5@free.fr \
    --to=hubskml@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).