From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Jules Bean <jules@jellybean.co.uk>
Cc: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: After partition resize, RAID5 array does not assemble on boot
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:52:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4849412D.9030607@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48469523.4050601@jellybean.co.uk>
Jules Bean wrote:
> David Greaves wrote:
>>> I don't really see that it's "safer" though. I would have thought it
>>> was
>>> quicker but potentially less safe.
>>
>> Avoiding a lot of time stress testing the disks in degraded mode
>> isn't 'safer'?
>
> Stress testing the disks by an md rebuild is a feature! It increases
> confidence that they work.
>
> ;)
>
> Seriously, I understand your point now. Yes, a rebuild-free partition
> resize would be a nice feature. So would a "help, please find my
> superblock by exhaustive scanning" utility ;)
Since this code must work when a partition is added on a totally new
drive, and when the partition is grown DOWN from the low end, clearly
the default must be a rebuild. And running "repair" before doing this
stuff is a really good idea!
What is needed is to do something like assume-clean on the old data and
a sync on the new chunks. I don't see that there is a remotely safe way
to do that, currently, although if you were willing to be unsafe you
could remove a partition, grow it at the "top" end, and reassemble with
--assume-clean. Sprinkling with holy water first might be a good thing.
I'm just thinking out loud here, there are probably good reasons why
this wouldn't work.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-06 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-03 6:49 After partition resize, RAID5 array does not assemble on boot Jules Bean
2008-06-03 21:19 ` Jules Bean
2008-06-03 21:27 ` NeilBrown
2008-06-04 6:31 ` Jules Bean
2008-06-04 6:36 ` Peter Rabbitson
2008-06-04 7:58 ` David Greaves
2008-06-04 8:30 ` Jules Bean
2008-06-04 11:51 ` David Greaves
2008-06-04 13:14 ` Jules Bean
2008-06-06 13:52 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2008-06-06 14:42 ` David Greaves
2008-06-06 14:46 ` Jules Bean
2008-06-12 3:59 ` Neil Brown
2008-06-03 21:46 ` Peter Rabbitson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4849412D.9030607@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=jules@jellybean.co.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).