* Metadata upgradable?
@ 2008-07-02 19:02 Oliver
2008-07-02 20:25 ` Justin Piszcz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oliver @ 2008-07-02 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi,
I've made the assumption last year or so that I won't ever be having an
array of more then 2Tb. The irony is of course that I thought of this
whilst building an array of 4x500gb. I've decided to stick an extra
500gb and expand the array a bit, and now I might bump into that 2TB
limitation of 0.9 superblocks.
I've read the manpage and it mentions something cryptic about superblock
1.2 restrictions, but I'm sure it's not something i'll have to worry
about. What I am curious about however is wether I can upgrade my
metadata on my raid5 array?
Thanks,
oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Metadata upgradable?
2008-07-02 19:02 Metadata upgradable? Oliver
@ 2008-07-02 20:25 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-02 20:40 ` Richard Scobie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2008-07-02 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver; +Cc: linux-raid
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Oliver wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've made the assumption last year or so that I won't ever be having an array
> of more then 2Tb. The irony is of course that I thought of this whilst
> building an array of 4x500gb. I've decided to stick an extra 500gb and expand
> the array a bit, and now I might bump into that 2TB limitation of 0.9
> superblocks.
>
> I've read the manpage and it mentions something cryptic about superblock 1.2
> restrictions, but I'm sure it's not something i'll have to worry about. What
> I am curious about however is wether I can upgrade my metadata on my raid5
> array?
>
> Thanks,
>
> oliver
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Hmm I used 0.93.00 to upgrade from 1.8TiB to 3.2TiB using 400GiB drives
without an issue, what 0.9x.xx are you running?
I continue to use 0.93.00 because it lets me boot using LILO in a RAID1
configuration and there still seems like there is a lot of confusion >
0.9x..
Justin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Metadata upgradable?
2008-07-02 20:25 ` Justin Piszcz
@ 2008-07-02 20:40 ` Richard Scobie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Scobie @ 2008-07-02 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver; +Cc: linux-raid
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Oliver wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've made the assumption last year or so that I won't ever be having
>> an array of more then 2Tb. The irony is of course that I thought of
>> this whilst building an array of 4x500gb. I've decided to stick an
>> extra 500gb and expand the array a bit, and now I might bump into that
>> 2TB limitation of 0.9 superblocks.
The 2TB limitation as I understand it, is for individual members of an
array, not the total size of it.
Regards,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-02 20:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-02 19:02 Metadata upgradable? Oliver
2008-07-02 20:25 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-07-02 20:40 ` Richard Scobie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).